These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26183752)

  • 21. Reactivity to patch tests with nickel sulfate and fragrance mix in infants.
    Jøhnke H; Norberg LA; Vach W; Bindslev-Jensen C; Høst A; Andersen KE
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 15479203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Positive concomitant test reactions to allergens in the standard patch test series.
    Landeck L; González E; Baden L; Neumann K; Schalock P
    Int J Dermatol; 2010 May; 49(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 20534085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fragrance series testing in eyelid dermatitis.
    Wenk KS; Ehrlich A
    Dermatitis; 2012; 23(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 22653065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of contact sensitization in chronic spontaneous urticaria.
    Magen E; Mishal J; Menachem S
    Am J Med Sci; 2011 Mar; 341(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 21233694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.
    Soni BP; Sherertz EF
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Mar; 8(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9066841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patch test reaction on Ethiopian subjects with eczema.
    Bilcha KD; Shibeshi D; Grangsjo A; Hiletework M
    Int J Dermatol; 2009 Sep; 48(9):979-83. PubMed ID: 19702984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007.
    Wetter DA; Yiannias JA; Prakash AV; Davis MD; Farmer SA; el-Azhary RA
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 63(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 20643495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relevance of positive patch-test reactions to fragrance mix.
    Devos SA; Constandt L; Tupker RA; Noz KC; Lucker GP; Bruynzeel DP; Schuttelaar ML; Kruyswijk MR; van Zuuren EJ; Vink J; Coenraads PJ; Kiemeney LA; van der Valk PG
    Dermatitis; 2008; 19(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18346396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prevalence and relevance of contact dermatitis allergens: a meta-analysis of 15 years of published T.R.U.E. test data.
    Krob HA; Fleischer AB; D'Agostino R; Haverstock CL; Feldman S
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 15337975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of questions related to allergic contact dermatitis.
    Fleming CJ; Burden AD; Forsyth A
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2000 Dec; 11(4):218-21. PubMed ID: 11123414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Patch test concentrations (doses in mg/cm2 ) for the 12 non-mix fragrance substances regulated by European legislation.
    Bruze M; Svedman C; Andersen KE; Bruynzeel D; Goossens A; Johansen JD; Matura M; Orton D; Vigan M;
    Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Mar; 66(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 22320667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sensitization to contact allergens and bronchial hyper-responsiveness.
    Schnabel E; Schoefer Y; Chen CM; Schäfer T; Behrendt H; Ring J; Wichmann HE; Heinrich J;
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Sep; 63(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 20690939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Allergic contact dermatitis in children with and without atopic dermatitis.
    Schena D; Papagrigoraki A; Tessari G; Peroni A; Sabbadini C; Girolomoni G
    Dermatitis; 2012; 23(6):275-80. PubMed ID: 23169209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patch testing and contact allergens in Ethiopia--results of 514 contact dermatitis patients using the European baseline series.
    Bilcha KD; Ayele A; Shibeshi D; Lovell C
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Sep; 63(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 20690936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Increased sensitivity of patch testing by standardized tape stripping beforehand: a multicentre diagnostic accuracy study.
    Dickel H; Kreft B; Kuss O; Worm M; Soost S; Brasch J; Pfützner W; Grabbe J; Angelova-Fischer I; Elsner P; Fluhr J; Altmeyer P; Geier J
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 May; 62(5):294-302. PubMed ID: 20536477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A retrospective study of 2585 patients patch tested with the European standard series in Hong Kong (1995-99).
    Lam WS; Chan LY; Ho SC; Chong LY; So WH; Wong TW
    Int J Dermatol; 2008 Feb; 47(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 18211481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix.
    Frosch PJ; Pirker C; Rastogi SC; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Menné T; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 15859993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. 'Calibration' of our patch test reading technique is necessary.
    Svedman C; Isaksson M; Björk J; Mowitz M; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Apr; 66(4):180-7. PubMed ID: 22404193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A study of new fragrance mixtures.
    Larsen W; Nakayama H; Fischer T; Elsner P; Frosch P; Burrows D; Jordan W; Shaw S; Wilkinson J; Marks J; Sugawara M; Nethercott M; Nethercottdagger J
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Dec; 9(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9810019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Immediate contact reactions to fragrance mix constituents and Myroxylon pereirae resin.
    Tanaka S; Matsumoto Y; Dlova N; Ostlere LS; Goldsmith PC; Rycroft RJ; Basketter DA; White IR; Banerjee P; McFadden JP
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 15291827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.