379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26183806)
1. The impact of low and intermediate-level radioactive waste on humans and the environment over the next one hundred thousand years.
Kautsky U; Saetre P; Berglund S; Jaeschke B; Nordén S; Brandefelt J; Keesmann S; Näslund JO; Andersson E
J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jan; 151 Pt 2():395-403. PubMed ID: 26183806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Swedish radiological environmental protection regulations applied in a review of a license application for a geological repository for spent nuclear fuel.
Andersson P; Stark K; Xu S; Nordén M; Dverstorp B
J Environ Radioact; 2017 Nov; 178-179():439-445. PubMed ID: 28427815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiological risk assessment and biosphere modelling for radioactive waste disposal in Switzerland.
Brennwald MS; van Dorp F
J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1058-61. PubMed ID: 19560845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Post-closure biosphere assessment modelling: comparison of complex and more stylised approaches.
Walke RC; Kirchner G; Xu S; Dverstorp B
J Environ Radioact; 2015 Oct; 148():50-8. PubMed ID: 26111499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modeling the long-term transport and accumulation of radionuclides in the landscape for derivation of dose conversion factors.
Avila RM; Kautsky U; Ekström PA
Ambio; 2006 Dec; 35(8):513-23. PubMed ID: 17334059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modeling the impact of climate change in Germany with biosphere models for long-term safety assessment of nuclear waste repositories.
Staudt C; Semiochkina N; Kaiser JC; Pröhl G
J Environ Radioact; 2013 Jan; 115():214-23. PubMed ID: 22742772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Generic performance assessment for a deep repository for low and intermediate level waste in the UK--a case study in assessing radiological impacts on the natural environment.
Jones SR; Patton D; Copplestone D; Norris S; O'Sullivan P
J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):89-119. PubMed ID: 12590072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A biosphere modeling methodology for dose assessments of the potential Yucca Mountain deep geological high level radioactive waste repository.
Watkins BM; Smith GM; Little RH; Kessler J
Health Phys; 1999 Apr; 76(4):355-67. PubMed ID: 10086596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of areas of interest for radiological impact assessments in an evolving landscape context.
Kłos R; Guerfi R; Dverstorp B; Xu S
J Environ Radioact; 2023 Jan; 256():107050. PubMed ID: 36368282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A physically based approach to modelling radionuclide transport in the biosphere.
Parkin G; Anderton SP; Ewen J; O'Donnell GM; Thorne MC; Crossland IG
J Radiol Prot; 1999 Dec; 19(4):319-31. PubMed ID: 10616778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Historical development and evolution of EPRI's post-closure dose assessment of potential releases to the biosphere from the proposed HLW repository at Yucca Mountain.
Smith G; Kozak MW
Health Phys; 2011 Dec; 101(6):709-21. PubMed ID: 22048489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental risks of radioactive discharges from a low-level radioactive waste disposal site at Dessel, Belgium.
Batlle JVI; Sweeck L; Wannijn J; Vandenhove H
J Environ Radioact; 2016 Oct; 162-163():263-278. PubMed ID: 27299850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of the Spanish methodological approach for biosphere assessment to a generic high-level waste disposal site.
Agüero A; Pinedo P; Simón I; Cancio D; Moraleda M; Trueba C; Pérez-Sánchez D
Sci Total Environ; 2008 Sep; 403(1-3):34-58. PubMed ID: 18614203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison between the example reference biosphere model ERB 2B and a process-based model: simulation of a natural release scenario.
Almahayni T
J Environ Radioact; 2014 Dec; 138():279-88. PubMed ID: 25306104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A biosphere assessment of high-level radioactive waste disposal in Sweden.
Kautsky U; Lindborg T; Valentin J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(1-2):103-7. PubMed ID: 25431486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Significance of 14C and 228Ra in terms of the proposed Yucca Mountain high-level radioactive waste repository.
Moeller DW; Ryan MT; Cherry RN; Sun LS
Health Phys; 2006 Sep; 91(3):238-48. PubMed ID: 16891899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact assessment of ionizing radiation on human and non-human biota from the vicinity of a near-surface radioactive waste repository.
Nedveckaite T; Gudelis A; Vives i Batlle J
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2013 May; 52(2):221-34. PubMed ID: 23377320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and comparison of five site-specific biosphere models for safety assessment of radioactive waste disposal.
Pröhl G; Olyslaegers G; Kanyar B; Pinedo P; Bergström U; Mobbs S; Eged K; Katona T; Simón I; Hallberg UB; Chen Q; Kowe R; Zeevaert T
J Radiol Prot; 2005 Dec; 25(4):343-73. PubMed ID: 16352869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radionuclide transfer in marine coastal ecosystems, a modelling study using metabolic processes and site data.
Konovalenko L; Bradshaw C; Kumblad L; Kautsky U
J Environ Radioact; 2014 Jul; 133():48-59. PubMed ID: 23768872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recent developments in assessment of long-term radionuclide behavior in the geosphere-biosphere subsystem.
Smith GM; Smith KL; Kowe R; Pérez-Sánchez D; Thorne M; Thiry Y; Read D; Molinero J
J Environ Radioact; 2014 May; 131():89-109. PubMed ID: 24238917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
