These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26184061)

  • 1. The Effect of Clinician Feedback Type on the Acquisition of a Vocal Siren.
    Joscelyne-May C; Madill CJ; Thorpe W; McCabe P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2015; 67(2):57-67. PubMed ID: 26184061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Show and Tell: Video Modeling and Instruction Without Feedback Improves Performance but Is Not Sufficient for Retention of a Complex Voice Motor Skill.
    Look C; McCabe P; Heard R; Madill CJ
    J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):239-249. PubMed ID: 29398452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of Pitch and Loudness Auditory Feedback Perturbations on Vocal Quality During Sustained Phonation.
    Schenck A; Hilger AI; Levant S; Kim JH; Lester-Smith RA; Larson C
    J Voice; 2023 Jan; 37(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 33191054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sex-related differences in vocal responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalization.
    Chen Z; Liu P; Jones JA; Huang D; Liu H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):EL355-60. PubMed ID: 21218857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of vocal intensity and vowel type on cepstral analysis of voice.
    Awan SN; Giovinco A; Owens J
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):670.e15-20. PubMed ID: 22480754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artificial pitch changing in auditory feedback as a possible method in voice training and therapy.
    Laukkanen AM
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1994; 46(2):86-96. PubMed ID: 8173617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A case report in changes in phonatory physiology following voice therapy: application of high-speed imaging.
    Patel RR; Pickering J; Stemple J; Donohue KD
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):734-41. PubMed ID: 22717492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on speech production.
    Chesters J; Baghai-Ravary L; Möttönen R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):873-83. PubMed ID: 25698020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of extended voice use on the acoustic characteristics of phonation after training and performance of actors from the La MaMa Experimental Theater club.
    Ferrone C; Galgano J; Ramig LO
    J Voice; 2011 May; 25(3):e123-37. PubMed ID: 20381306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vocal tract and glottal function during and after vocal exercising with resonance tube and straw.
    Guzman M; Laukkanen AM; Krupa P; Horáček J; Švec JG; Geneid A
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):523.e19-34. PubMed ID: 23683806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of resonance tubes on glottal contact quotient with and without task instruction: a comparison of trained and untrained voices.
    Gaskill CS; Quinney DM
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):e79-93. PubMed ID: 21550779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of vocal warm-up exercises on the objective vocal quality in female students training to be speech language pathologists.
    Van Lierde KM; D'haeseleer E; Baudonck N; Claeys S; De Bodt M; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2011 May; 25(3):e115-21. PubMed ID: 20236794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Voice outcome in patients treated for laryngeal cancer: efficacy of voice rehabilitation.
    Tuomi L; Björkner E; Finizia C
    J Voice; 2014 Jan; 28(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 23769005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suppression of vocal responses to auditory perturbation with real-time visual feedback.
    Ning LH; Loucks TM; Shih C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):3698. PubMed ID: 29960493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of compliance monitoring of vocal function exercises on voice outcome measures for normal voice.
    Ellis LW; Beltyukova SA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Jun; 112(3):729-36. PubMed ID: 21853762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vocal Performance of Group Fitness Instructors Before and After Instruction: Changes in Acoustic Measures and Self-Ratings.
    Dallaston K; Rumbach AF
    J Voice; 2016 Jan; 30(1):127.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25795364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of HearFones on speaking and singing voice quality.
    Laukkanen AM; Mickelson NP; Laitala M; Syrjä T; Salo A; Sihvo M
    J Voice; 2004 Dec; 18(4):475-87. PubMed ID: 15567049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The role of laryngeal kinesthetic feedback in the control of pitch in speech production].
    Duflo S; Ouaknine M; Ghio A; Giovanni A
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2007; 128(5):297-303. PubMed ID: 20387375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S; Lowit A
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On how the brain decodes vocal cues about speaker confidence.
    Jiang X; Pell MD
    Cortex; 2015 May; 66():9-34. PubMed ID: 25796072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.