These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26186111)

  • 21. Expanding school psychology's horizons for understanding and conducting research: commentary on the special series on statistical analysis.
    Betts J
    J Sch Psychol; 2010 Feb; 48(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 20006985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The file-drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis.
    Rosenberg MS
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):464-8. PubMed ID: 15807430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Meta-analysis: is moving the goal post the answer?
    Egger M; Smith GD; Sterne JA
    Lancet; 1998 May; 351(9114):1517. PubMed ID: 9605838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The life of p: "just significant" results are on the rise.
    Leggett NC; Thomas NA; Loetscher T; Nicholls ME
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2303-9. PubMed ID: 24205936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How to build a better mousetrap: introduction to the special issue on methodology and design.
    Noll RB
    J Pediatr Psychol; 2002; 27(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 11726674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Community-Augmented Meta-Analyses: Toward Cumulative Data Assessment.
    Tsuji S; Bergmann C; Cristia A
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 9(6):661-5. PubMed ID: 26186116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Standardized or simple effect size: what should be reported?
    Baguley T
    Br J Psychol; 2009 Aug; 100(Pt 3):603-17. PubMed ID: 19017432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bias in the design, interpretation, and publication of industry-sponsored clinical research.
    Hammerschmidt D
    Minn Med; 2008 Jun; 91(6):46-7. PubMed ID: 18616022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias.
    Bennett DA; Latham NK; Stretton C; Anderson CS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 15135835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improving training in methodology enriches the science of psychology.
    Aiken LS; West SG; Millsap RE
    Am Psychol; 2009 Jan; 64(1):discussion 51-2. PubMed ID: 19209970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence: publication bias].
    Nolting A; Perleth M; Langer G; Meerpohl JJ; Gartlehner G; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(9):670-6. PubMed ID: 23200211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.
    Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):894-901. PubMed ID: 16085192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The iceberg phenomenon and publication bias: the editors' fault?
    Boissel JP; Haugh MC
    Clin Trials Metaanal; 1993 Nov; 28(6):309-15. PubMed ID: 10150179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Scientific dogma-a personal experience.
    Thompson M
    Analyst; 2004 Oct; 129(10):865. PubMed ID: 15457312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05.
    Masicampo EJ; Lalande DR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2271-9. PubMed ID: 22853650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias.
    Guyatt GH; Oxman AD; Montori V; Vist G; Kunz R; Brozek J; Alonso-Coello P; Djulbegovic B; Atkins D; Falck-Ytter Y; Williams JW; Meerpohl J; Norris SL; Akl EA; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1277-82. PubMed ID: 21802904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evidence of publication bias in clinical trials of biotherapies for solid tumors.
    Ottaiano A; Castello G; Ascierto PA
    Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(4):653. PubMed ID: 15597405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Single-case research design in pediatric psychology: considerations regarding data analysis.
    Cohen LL; Feinstein A; Masuda A; Vowles KE
    J Pediatr Psychol; 2014 Mar; 39(2):124-37. PubMed ID: 24003176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Duty to Describe: Better the Devil You Know Than the Devil You Don't.
    Brown SD; Furrow D; Hill DF; Gable JC; Porter LP; Jacobs WJ
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 9(6):626-40. PubMed ID: 26186113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.