These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26186113)

  • 1. A Duty to Describe: Better the Devil You Know Than the Devil You Don't.
    Brown SD; Furrow D; Hill DF; Gable JC; Porter LP; Jacobs WJ
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 9(6):626-40. PubMed ID: 26186113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When averaging goes wrong: The case for mixture model estimation in psychological science.
    Moreau D; Corballis MC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1615-1627. PubMed ID: 30489120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analyzing matrices of meta-analytic correlations: current practices and recommendations.
    Sheng Z; Kong W; Cortina JM; Hou S
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):187-208. PubMed ID: 27286903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comment on sampling error in the standardized mean difference with unequal sample sizes: avoiding potential errors in meta-analytic and primary research.
    Laczo RM; Sackett PR; Bobko P; Cortina JM
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Jul; 90(4):758-64. PubMed ID: 16060792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Constraints on Generality (COG): A Proposed Addition to All Empirical Papers.
    Simons DJ; Shoda Y; Lindsay DS
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 12(6):1123-1128. PubMed ID: 28853993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis of coefficient alpha.
    Rodriguez MC; Maeda Y
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Sep; 11(3):306-22. PubMed ID: 16953707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical analyses for studying replication: Meta-analytic perspectives.
    Hedges LV; Schauer JM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):557-570. PubMed ID: 30070547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science.
    Hopkins WG; Marshall SW; Batterham AM; Hanin J
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2009 Jan; 41(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 19092709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects.
    Kvarven A; Strømland E; Johannesson M
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 4(4):423-434. PubMed ID: 31873200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support.
    International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation
    Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e955-77. PubMed ID: 16618790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analytic Review as a Solution to the Misreporting of Statistical Results in Psychological Science.
    Sakaluk J; Williams A; Biernat M
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 9(6):652-60. PubMed ID: 26186115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correcting for indirect range restriction in meta-analysis: testing a new meta-analytic procedure.
    Le H; Schmidt FL
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):416-38. PubMed ID: 17154755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-analytic interval estimation for bivariate correlations.
    Bonett DG
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Sep; 13(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 18778150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surveillance for stage I seminoma: better the devil you know than the devil you don't?
    Buyyounouski MK
    Oncology (Williston Park); 2009 Aug; 23(9):762, 764. PubMed ID: 19777760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "Don't know" responses in surveys: is what I know what you want to know and do I want you to know it?
    Beatty P; Herrmann D; Puskar C; Kerwin J
    Memory; 1998 Jul; 6(4):407-26. PubMed ID: 9829099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in endodontics.
    Suebnukarn S; Ngamboonsirisingh S; Rattanabanlang A
    J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):602-8. PubMed ID: 20307731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. You Cannot Step Into the Same River Twice: When Power Analyses Are Optimistic.
    McShane BB; Böckenholt U
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 9(6):612-25. PubMed ID: 26186112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.
    Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):894-901. PubMed ID: 16085192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.