These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26186117)

  • 1. p-Curve and Effect Size: Correcting for Publication Bias Using Only Significant Results.
    Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 9(6):666-81. PubMed ID: 26186117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. p-Hacking and publication bias interact to distort meta-analytic effect size estimates.
    Friese M; Frankenbach J
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):456-471. PubMed ID: 31789538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A test for publication bias in meta-analysis with sparse binary data.
    Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):721-33. PubMed ID: 16755545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. P-curve: a key to the file-drawer.
    Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Apr; 143(2):534-47. PubMed ID: 23855496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some properties of p-curves, with an application to gradual publication bias.
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):546-560. PubMed ID: 28425729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science.
    Head ML; Holman L; Lanfear R; Kahn AT; Jennions MD
    PLoS Biol; 2015 Mar; 13(3):e1002106. PubMed ID: 25768323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence that nonsignificant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting?
    Chuard PJC; Vrtílek M; Head ML; Jennions MD
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Jan; 17(1):e3000127. PubMed ID: 30682013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology.
    Yang Y; Sánchez-Tójar A; O'Dea RE; Noble DWA; Koricheva J; Jennions MD; Parker TH; Lagisz M; Nakagawa S
    BMC Biol; 2023 Apr; 21(1):71. PubMed ID: 37013585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of publication bias on the Q test and assessment of heterogeneity.
    Augusteijn HEM; van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):116-134. PubMed ID: 30489099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is There Evidence of P-Hacking in Imaging Research?
    Rooprai P; Islam N; Salameh JP; Ebrahimzadeh S; Kazi A; Frank R; Ramsay T; Mathur MB; Absi M; Khalil A; Kazi S; Dawit H; Lam E; Fabiano N; McInnes MDF
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2023 Aug; 74(3):497-507. PubMed ID: 36412994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.
    Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):894-901. PubMed ID: 16085192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A survey of publication bias within evolutionary ecology.
    Cassey P; Ewen JG; Blackburn TM; Møller AP
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Dec; 271 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S451-4. PubMed ID: 15801601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Significance bias: an empirical evaluation of the oral health literature.
    Kagereki E; Gakonyo J; Simila H
    BMC Oral Health; 2016 May; 16(1):53. PubMed ID: 27150796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values: Reservations and Recommendations for Applying p-Uniform and p-Curve.
    van Aert RC; Wicherts JM; van Assen MA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(5):713-729. PubMed ID: 27694466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Publication bias and the canonization of false facts.
    Nissen SB; Magidson T; Gross K; Bergstrom CT
    Elife; 2016 Dec; 5():. PubMed ID: 27995896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inflation of type I error rate in two statistical tests for the detection of publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2465-77. PubMed ID: 12205693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using pseudo-data to correct for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Bowden J; Thompson JR; Burton P
    Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(22):3798-813. PubMed ID: 16382418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analysis and publication bias: How well does the FAT-PET-PEESE procedure work?
    Alinaghi N; Reed WR
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):285-311. PubMed ID: 29532634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Monte-Carlo estimation of effect size distortion due to significance testing.
    Bradley MT; Smith D; Stoica G
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):837-42. PubMed ID: 12509183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.