These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26186690)

  • 1. Perceived fairness of pay among people with and without disabilities: a propensity score matched analysis of working Australians.
    Milner A; Aitken Z; Krnjacki L; Bentley R; Blakely T; LaMontagne AD; Kavanagh AM
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2015 Sep; 41(5):451-9. PubMed ID: 26186690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adjusting for Confounding in Early Postlaunch Settings: Going Beyond Logistic Regression Models.
    Schmidt AF; Klungel OH; Groenwold RH;
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 26436519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Employment status and mental health among persons with and without a disability: evidence from an Australian cohort study.
    Milner A; LaMontagne AD; Aitken Z; Bentley R; Kavanagh AM
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2014 Nov; 68(11):1064-71. PubMed ID: 25053615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disability acquisition and mental health: effect modification by demographic and socioeconomic characteristics using data from an Australian longitudinal study.
    Aitken Z; Simpson JA; Bentley R; Kavanagh AM
    BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e016953. PubMed ID: 28928189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Studies with many covariates and few outcomes: selecting covariates and implementing propensity-score-based confounding adjustments.
    Patorno E; Glynn RJ; Hernández-Díaz S; Liu J; Schneeweiss S
    Epidemiology; 2014 Mar; 25(2):268-78. PubMed ID: 24487209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disability at Work: A Look Back and Forward.
    Schur L; Han K; Kim A; Ameri M; Blanck P; Kruse D
    J Occup Rehabil; 2017 Dec; 27(4):482-497. PubMed ID: 29110160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Introduction to propensity scores.
    Williamson EJ; Forbes A
    Respirology; 2014 Jul; 19(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 24889820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of free health care on polypharmacy: a comparison of propensity score methods and multivariable regression to account for confounding.
    Richardson K; Kenny RA; Bennett K
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2014 Jun; 23(6):656-65. PubMed ID: 24677639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disability and employment among U.S. working-age immigrants.
    Xiang H; Shi J; Wheeler K; Wilkins JR
    Am J Ind Med; 2010 Apr; 53(4):425-34. PubMed ID: 20187002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disability in two health care systems: access, quality, satisfaction, and physician contacts among working-age Canadians and Americans with disabilities.
    Gulley SP; Altman BM
    Disabil Health J; 2008 Oct; 1(4):196-208. PubMed ID: 21122730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parenting with a disability and child mental health: a propensity score analysis.
    Neely-Barnes S; Zanskas S; Delavega ME; Evans TK
    J Soc Work Disabil Rehabil; 2014; 13(3):226-46. PubMed ID: 24811841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regularized Regression Versus the High-Dimensional Propensity Score for Confounding Adjustment in Secondary Database Analyses.
    Franklin JM; Eddings W; Glynn RJ; Schneeweiss S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 182(7):651-9. PubMed ID: 26233956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of disease risk scores, propensity scores, and traditional multivariable outcome regression in the presence of multiple confounders.
    Arbogast PG; Ray WA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 174(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 21749976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are associations between neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics and body mass index or waist circumference based on model extrapolations?
    Leal C; Bean K; Thomas F; Chaix B
    Epidemiology; 2011 Sep; 22(5):694-703. PubMed ID: 21709560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential labour market impacts from disability onset.
    Polidano C; Vu H
    Health Econ; 2015 Mar; 24(3):302-17. PubMed ID: 24347335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An overview of the objectives of and the approaches to propensity score analyses.
    Heinze G; Jüni P
    Eur Heart J; 2011 Jul; 32(14):1704-8. PubMed ID: 21362706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Employment predictors of exit from work among workers with disabilities: A survival analysis from the household income labour dynamics in Australia survey.
    Milner A; Taouk Y; Disney G; Aitken Z; Rachele J; Kavanagh A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208334. PubMed ID: 30532254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Weaknesses of goodness-of-fit tests for evaluating propensity score models: the case of the omitted confounder.
    Weitzen S; Lapane KL; Toledano AY; Hume AL; Mor V
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Apr; 14(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 15386700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Propensity scores in observational research].
    Groenwold RH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2013; 157(29):A6179. PubMed ID: 23859107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transportation use patterns of U.S. children and teenagers with disabilities.
    Wheeler K; Yang Y; Xiang H
    Disabil Health J; 2009 Jul; 2(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 21122755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.