276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26186982)
1. How individual participant data meta-analyses have influenced trial design, conduct, and analysis.
Tierney JF; Pignon JP; Gueffyier F; Clarke M; Askie L; Vale CL; Burdett S;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 68(11):1325-35. PubMed ID: 26186982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of aggregate and individual participant data approaches to meta-analysis of randomised trials: An observational study.
Tierney JF; Fisher DJ; Burdett S; Stewart LA; Parmar MKB
PLoS Med; 2020 Jan; 17(1):e1003019. PubMed ID: 32004320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD Statement.
Stewart LA; Clarke M; Rovers M; Riley RD; Simmonds M; Stewart G; Tierney JF;
JAMA; 2015 Apr; 313(16):1657-65. PubMed ID: 25919529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. No consistent evidence of data availability bias existed in recent individual participant data meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study.
Tsujimoto Y; Fujii T; Onishi A; Omae K; Luo Y; Imai H; Takahashi S; Itaya T; Pinson C; Nevitt SJ; Furukawa TA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 118():107-114.e5. PubMed ID: 31654789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uptake of systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on individual participant data in clinical practice guidelines: descriptive study.
Vale CL; Rydzewska LH; Rovers MM; Emberson JR; Gueyffier F; Stewart LA;
BMJ; 2015 Mar; 350():h1088. PubMed ID: 25747860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Individual participant data meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies: state of the art?
Abo-Zaid G; Sauerbrei W; Riley RD
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Apr; 12():56. PubMed ID: 22530717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring changes over time and characteristics associated with data retrieval across individual participant data meta-analyses: systematic review.
Nevitt SJ; Marson AG; Davie B; Reynolds S; Williams L; Smith CT
BMJ; 2017 Apr; 357():j1390. PubMed ID: 28381561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Meta-analysis using individual participant data from randomised trials: opportunities and limitations created by access to raw data.
Rogozińska E; Marlin N; Thangaratinam S; Khan KS; Zamora J
Evid Based Med; 2017 Oct; 22(5):157-162. PubMed ID: 28818966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The methodological quality of individual participant data meta-analysis on intervention effects: systematic review.
Wang H; Chen Y; Lin Y; Abesig J; Wu IX; Tam W
BMJ; 2021 Apr; 373():n736. PubMed ID: 33875446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are there inequalities in the attendance and effectiveness of behavioural weight management interventions for adults in the UK? Protocol for an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis.
Birch JM; Mueller J; Sharp S; Logue J; Kelly MP; Griffin SJ; Ahern A
BMJ Open; 2023 Mar; 13(3):e067607. PubMed ID: 36958788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A decade of individual participant data meta-analyses: A review of current practice.
Simmonds M; Stewart G; Stewart L
Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):76-83. PubMed ID: 26091948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Individual participant data (IPD)-level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials among dark-skinned populations to estimate the dietary requirement for vitamin D.
Cashman KD; Ritz C
Syst Rev; 2019 May; 8(1):128. PubMed ID: 31138301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methods and characteristics of published network meta-analyses using individual patient data: protocol for a scoping review.
Veroniki AA; Soobiah C; Tricco AC; Elliott MJ; Straus SE
BMJ Open; 2015 Apr; 5(4):e007103. PubMed ID: 25926144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PRIME-IPD SERIES Part 1. The PRIME-IPD tool promoted verification and standardization of study datasets retrieved for IPD meta-analysis.
Dewidar O; Riddle A; Ghogomu E; Hossain A; Arora P; Bhutta ZA; Black RE; Cousens S; Gaffey MF; Mathew C; Trawin J; Tugwell P; Welch V; Wells GA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 136():227-234. PubMed ID: 34044099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The strengths and limitations of meta-analyses based on aggregate data.
Lyman GH; Kuderer NM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Apr; 5():14. PubMed ID: 15850485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficient two-step multivariate random effects meta-analysis of individual participant data for longitudinal clinical trials using mixed effects models.
Noma H; Maruo K; Gosho M; Levine SZ; Goldberg Y; Leucht S; Furukawa TA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):33. PubMed ID: 30764757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recommendations for individual participant data meta-analyses on work stressors and health outcomes: comments on IPD-Work Consortium papers.
Choi BK; Schnall P; Landsbergis P; Dobson M; Ko S; Gómez-Ortiz V; Juárez-Garcia A; Baker D
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2015 May; 41(3):299-311. PubMed ID: 25719554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The INVEST project: investigating the use of evidence synthesis in the design and analysis of clinical trials.
Clayton GL; Smith IL; Higgins JPT; Mihaylova B; Thorpe B; Cicero R; Lokuge K; Forman JR; Tierney JF; White IR; Sharples LD; Jones HE
Trials; 2017 May; 18(1):219. PubMed ID: 28506284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survey finds that most meta-analysts do not attempt to collect individual patient data.
Kovalchik SA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Dec; 65(12):1296-9. PubMed ID: 22981246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
