308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26187718)
1. From bad to worse: collider stratification amplifies confounding bias in the "obesity paradox".
Banack HR; Kaufman JS
Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1111-4. PubMed ID: 26187718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The obesity paradox: understanding the effect of obesity on mortality among individuals with cardiovascular disease.
Banack HR; Kaufman JS
Prev Med; 2014 May; 62():96-102. PubMed ID: 24525165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does selection bias explain the obesity paradox among individuals with cardiovascular disease?
Banack HR; Kaufman JS
Ann Epidemiol; 2015 May; 25(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 25867852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Collider Bias Is Only a Partial Explanation for the Obesity Paradox.
Sperrin M; Candlish J; Badrick E; Renehan A; Buchan I
Epidemiology; 2016 Jul; 27(4):525-30. PubMed ID: 27075676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of collider-stratification bias and the birthweight paradox.
Whitcomb BW; Schisterman EF; Perkins NJ; Platt RW
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2009 Sep; 23(5):394-402. PubMed ID: 19689488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantifying biases in causal models: classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias.
Greenland S
Epidemiology; 2003 May; 14(3):300-6. PubMed ID: 12859030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implications of M bias in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.
Liu W; Brookhart MA; Schneeweiss S; Mi X; Setoguchi S
Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 176(10):938-48. PubMed ID: 23100247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Confounding, causality, and confusion: the role of intermediate variables in interpreting observational studies in obstetrics.
Ananth CV; Schisterman EF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 217(2):167-175. PubMed ID: 28427805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The current deconstruction of paradoxes: one sign of the ongoing methodological "revolution".
Porta M; Vineis P; Bolúmar F
Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1079-87. PubMed ID: 26164615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Introduction to causal diagrams for confounder selection.
Williamson EJ; Aitken Z; Lawrie J; Dharmage SC; Burgess JA; Forbes AB
Respirology; 2014 Apr; 19(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 24447391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methods of calculating deaths attributable to obesity.
Flegal KM; Graubard BI; Williamson DF
Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 160(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 15286018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating the Time-Varying Joint Effects of Obesity and Smoking on All-Cause Mortality Using Marginal Structural Models.
Banack HR; Kaufman JS
Am J Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 183(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 26656480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accounting for Selection Bias in Studies of Acute Cardiac Events.
Banack HR; Harper S; Kaufman JS
Can J Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 34(6):709-716. PubMed ID: 29801736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Obesity paradox in heart failure: statistical artifact, or impetus to rethink clinical practice?
Charnigo R; Guglin M
Heart Fail Rev; 2017 Jan; 22(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 27567626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bias in calculation of attributable fractions using relative risks from nonsmokers only.
Flegal KM
Epidemiology; 2014 Nov; 25(6):913-6. PubMed ID: 25210928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Obesity paradox: conditioning on disease enhances biases in estimating the mortality risks of obesity.
Preston SH; Stokes A
Epidemiology; 2014 May; 25(3):454-61. PubMed ID: 24608666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian modelling of lung cancer risk and bitumen fume exposure adjusted for unmeasured confounding by smoking.
de Vocht F; Kromhout H; Ferro G; Boffetta P; Burstyn I
Occup Environ Med; 2009 Aug; 66(8):502-8. PubMed ID: 19060029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reverse causality and confounding and the associations of overweight and obesity with mortality.
Lawlor DA; Hart CL; Hole DJ; Davey Smith G
Obesity (Silver Spring); 2006 Dec; 14(12):2294-304. PubMed ID: 17189558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Limitations of individual causal models, causal graphs, and ignorability assumptions, as illustrated by random confounding and design unfaithfulness.
Greenland S; Mansournia MA
Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1101-10. PubMed ID: 25687168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. "The obesity paradox" in disease--is the protective effect of obesity true?
Braun N; Gomes F; Schütz P
Swiss Med Wkly; 2015; 145():w14265. PubMed ID: 26709887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
