These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2618790)

  • 21. Using response time modeling to understand the sources of dual-task interference in a dynamic environment.
    Palada H; Neal A; Strayer D; Ballard T; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1331-1345. PubMed ID: 31282694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Verbal asymmetries and levels of processing in an interactive dual-task paradigm.
    Adams BJ; Duda PD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Apr; 60(2):371-83. PubMed ID: 4000849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Information presentation through a head-worn display ("smart glasses") has a smaller influence on the temporal structure of gait variability during dual-task gait compared to handheld displays (paper-based system and smartphone).
    Sedighi A; Ulman SM; Nussbaum MA
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195106. PubMed ID: 29630614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A role for spatial and nonspatial working memory processes in visual search.
    Anderson EJ; Mannan SK; Rees G; Sumner P; Kennard C
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(5):301-12. PubMed ID: 25116297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dual-task interference: attentional and neurophysiological influences.
    Hiraga CY; Garry MI; Carson RG; Summers JJ
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 205(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 19631693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of aging and task difficulty on divided attention performance.
    McDowd JM; Craik FIM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 May; 14(2):267-280. PubMed ID: 2967880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual search without attentional displacement.
    Zénon A; Ben Hamed S; Duhamel JR; Olivier E
    J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):9.1-15. PubMed ID: 20053072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A common source of attention for auditory and visual tracking.
    Fougnie D; Cockhren J; Marois R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1571-1583. PubMed ID: 29717471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Is there a specific executive capacity for dual task coordination? Evidence from Alzheimer's disease.
    Logie RH; Cocchini G; Delia Sala S; Baddeley AD
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Jul; 18(3):504-13. PubMed ID: 15291728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The involvement of central attention in visual search is determined by task demands.
    Han SW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Apr; 79(3):726-737. PubMed ID: 28116644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Resource allocation and somatosensory P300 amplitude during dual task: effects of tracking speed and predictability of tracking direction.
    Kida T; Nishihira Y; Hatta A; Wasaka T; Tazoe T; Sakajiri Y; Nakata H; Kaneda T; Kuroiwa K; Akiyama S; Sakamoto M; Kamijo K; Higashiura T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 115(11):2616-28. PubMed ID: 15465451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attention allocation in the dual-task paradigm as measured through behavioral and psychophysiological responses.
    Karatekin C; Couperus JW; Marcus DJ
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Mar; 41(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 15032983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of temporal unpredictability for process interference and code overlap in perception-action dual tasks.
    Koch I; Metin B; Schuch S
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):244-52. PubMed ID: 12684780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Age differences and similarities in the improvement of controlled search.
    Madden DJ
    Exp Aging Res; 1982; 8(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 7128659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A neuropsychological assessment of dual-task costs in closed-head injury patients using Cohen's effect size estimation method.
    Dell'Acqua R; Sessa P; Pashler H
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):553-61. PubMed ID: 16142490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Divided attention abilities in young and old adults.
    Somberg BL; Salthouse TA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Oct; 8(5):651-63. PubMed ID: 6218227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. What causes residual dual-task interference after practice?
    Ruthruff E; Hazeltine E; Remington RW
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):494-503. PubMed ID: 16184395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Rapid speech processing and divided attention: processing rate versus processing resources as an explanation of age effects.
    Tun PA; Wingfield A; Stine EA; Mecsas C
    Psychol Aging; 1992 Dec; 7(4):546-50. PubMed ID: 1466823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Divergent response-time patterns in vigilance decrement tasks.
    Rubinstein JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1058-1076. PubMed ID: 32852983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perceptual load and attentional boost: a study of their interaction.
    Swallow KM; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1034-45. PubMed ID: 24364707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.