These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26188312)

  • 1. Dissociation between line bisection and mental-number-line bisection in healthy adults.
    Rotondaro F; Merola S; Aiello M; Pinto M; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():565-76. PubMed ID: 26188312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pseudoneglect for the bisection of mental number lines.
    Loftus AM; Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Chapman HL; Bradshaw JL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):925-45. PubMed ID: 18780193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of distractors and numerical direction on mental number line bisection.
    Thomas NA; Rose W; Nicholls ME
    Laterality; 2017 Jan; 22(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 26529579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adult developmental trajectories of pseudoneglect in the tactile, visual and auditory modalities and the influence of starting position and stimulus length.
    Brooks JL; Darling S; Malvaso C; Della Sala S
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Mar; 103():12-22. PubMed ID: 26799680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deaf Individuals Show a Leftward Bias in Numerical Bisection.
    Cattaneo Z; Cecchetto C; Papagno C
    Perception; 2016; 45(1-2):156-64. PubMed ID: 26562852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.
    Toba MN; Cavanagh P; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 21110990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The spatial representation of numbers: evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect.
    Umiltà C; Priftis K; Zorzi M
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 192(3):561-9. PubMed ID: 18985329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blind individuals show pseudoneglect in bisecting numerical intervals.
    Cattaneo Z; Fantino M; Silvanto J; Tinti C; Vecchi T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1021-8. PubMed ID: 21287314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parietal rTMS distorts the mental number line: simulating 'spatial' neglect in healthy subjects.
    Göbel SM; Calabria M; Farnè A; Rossetti Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(6):860-8. PubMed ID: 16260006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No inherent left and right side in human 'mental number line': evidence from right brain damage.
    Aiello M; Jacquin-Courtois S; Merola S; Ottaviani T; Tomaiuolo F; Bueti D; Rossetti Y; Doricchi F
    Brain; 2012 Aug; 135(Pt 8):2492-505. PubMed ID: 22577222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial attention and the mental number line: evidence for characteristic biases and compression.
    Longo MR; Lourenco SF
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(7):1400-7. PubMed ID: 17157335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Positive correlation in the bisection of long and short horizontal Oppel-Kundt illusory gradients: Implications for the interpretation of the "cross-over" effect in spatial neglect.
    Binetti N; Aiello M; Merola S; Bruschini M; Lecce F; Macci E; Doricchi F
    Cortex; 2011 May; 47(5):608-16. PubMed ID: 20926070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does spatial cueing affect line bisection in chronic hemianopia?
    Kuhn C; Rosenthal A; Bublak P; Grotemeyer KH; Reinhart S; Kerkhoff G
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1656-62. PubMed ID: 22480681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Thut G
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86(100):370-80. PubMed ID: 24128738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Jewell G
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(7):843-55. PubMed ID: 10408651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optokinetic stimulation modulates neglect for the number space: evidence from mental number interval bisection.
    Priftis K; Pitteri M; Meneghello F; Umiltà C; Zorzi M
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():23. PubMed ID: 22363280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pseudoneglect in solid-line versus character-line bisection tasks: a test for attention dominance theory.
    Lee BH; Kim M; Kang SJ; Park KC; Kim EJ; Adair JC; Na DL
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2004 Sep; 17(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 15536305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Right up there: hemispatial and hand asymmetries of altitudinal pseudoneglect.
    Suavansri K; Falchook AD; Williamson JB; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Aug; 79(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 22546730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The reliability of pseudoneglect is task dependent.
    Mitchell AG; Harris JM; Benstock SE; Ales JM
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Nov; 148():107618. PubMed ID: 32891646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Olafson C
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 Mar; 35(3):369-80. PubMed ID: 9051685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.