143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26189256)
1. The differences of phyllodes and acoustic attenuation in breast lesions diagnosed with Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System for Ultrasonography (BI-RADS-US) category 4C.
Li YY; Liu C; Geng J; Li JG; Jin F; Wang XM
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2015; 36(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 26189256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation.
Elverici E; Barça AN; Aktaş H; Özsoy A; Zengin B; Çavuşoğlu M; Araz L
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 25835079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Wang XY; Kang LK; Lan CY
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2014; 35(4):415-20. PubMed ID: 25118483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Texture Analysis of Ultrasound Images to Differentiate Simple Fibroadenomas From Complex Fibroadenomas and Benign Phyllodes Tumors.
Basara Akin I; Ozgul H; Simsek K; Altay C; Secil M; Balci P
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Oct; 39(10):1993-2003. PubMed ID: 32329531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic value of breast ultrasound in mammography BI-RADS 0 and clinically indeterminate or suspicious of malignancy breast lesions.
Dobrosavljević A; Rakić S; Nikoli B; Raznatović SJ; Dikić SD; Milosević Z; Jurisić A; Skrobić M
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Mar; 73(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 27295907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. From the archives of the AFIP: breast masses in children and adolescents: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Chung EM; Cube R; Hall GJ; González C; Stocker JT; Glassman LM
Radiographics; 2009; 29(3):907-31. PubMed ID: 19448124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First ultrasound diagnosis of BI-RADS 3 lesions in young patients: Can 6-months follow-up be sufficient to assess stability?
Marcon M; Frauenfelder T; Becker AS; Dedes KJ; Boss A
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():226-233. PubMed ID: 28267544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA enhancement: comparison with mammography and ultrasonography.
Hachiya J; Seki T; Okada M; Nitatori T; Korenaga T; Furuya Y
Radiat Med; 1991; 9(6):232-40. PubMed ID: 1668410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency of Categories 4 and 5 of the Second Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Diagnosing Breast Lesions.
Zou X; Wang J; Lan X; Lin Q; Han F; Liu L; Li A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2065-71. PubMed ID: 27262521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Practical aspects of breast ultrasound].
Biedermann KJ; Schiesser M
Praxis (Bern 1994); 2004 Apr; 93(17):707-11. PubMed ID: 15152673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Value of BI-RADS ultrasonic scores of direct and indirect ultrasonographic signs in diagnosis of solid breast lesions].
Gao JX; Yu XQ; Yao LH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 33(6):465-9. PubMed ID: 21875490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.
Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Weber S; Thomas A; Fischer T; Slowinski T; Schmidt W; Degenhardt F
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of ultrasound, cytological, and histological features of 110 benign BI-RADS categories 4C and 5 nonpalpable breast lesions. The Institut Curie's experience.
Farras Roca JA; Tardivon A; Thibault F; Rouzier R; Klijanienko J
Cancer Cytopathol; 2021 Jun; 129(6):479-488. PubMed ID: 33689204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gray-scale and color Doppler sonographic features of complex fibroadenomas of the breast.
Lee KH; Kim SJ; Park YM; Kim W; Yoon JH; Song JW; Kim SH; Lim YJ; Baek HJ; Kim SJ; Lee Y
J Clin Ultrasound; 2015; 43(9):556-62. PubMed ID: 26200475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sonographic features of histopathologically benign solid breast lesions that have been classified as BI-RADS 4 on sonography.
Taskin F; Koseoglu K; Ozbas S; Erkus M; Karaman C
J Clin Ultrasound; 2012 Jun; 40(5):261-5. PubMed ID: 22508447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses using quantified BI-RADS findings.
Moon WK; Lo CM; Cho N; Chang JM; Huang CS; Chen JH; Chang RF
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Jul; 111(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 23639752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasonography and core needle biopsy in the differential diagnosis of fibroadenoma and tumor phyllodes.
Bode MK; Rissanen T; Apaja-Sarkkinen M
Acta Radiol; 2007 Sep; 48(7):708-13. PubMed ID: 17728999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions?
Tozaki M; Fukuma E
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):706-10. PubMed ID: 21596798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5.
Fu CY; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Hsu KF; Chan DC; Ku CH; Lu TC; Chu CH
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 20603785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
