These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26190151)

  • 1. Simulation Detection in Handwritten Documents by Forensic Document Examiners.
    Kam M; Abichandani P; Hewett T
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):936-41. PubMed ID: 26190151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Writer identification using hand-printed and non-hand-printed questioned documents.
    Kam M; Lin E
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Nov; 48(6):1391-5. PubMed ID: 14640291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Signature authentication by forensic document examiners.
    Kam M; Gummadidala K; Fielding G; Conn R
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 Jul; 46(4):884-8. PubMed ID: 11451071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forensic document examiners' skill in distinguishing between natural and disguised handwriting behaviors.
    Bird C; Found B; Rogers D
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Sep; 55(5):1291-5. PubMed ID: 20533988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forensic handwriting examiners' expertise for signature comparison.
    Sita J; Found B; Rogers DK
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Sep; 47(5):1117-24. PubMed ID: 12353558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A study on factors that affect error rates in handwriting examinations of Korean characters by forensic document examiners and non-experts.
    Kang TY; Kim H; Yook S; Lee J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 May; 334():111266. PubMed ID: 35278787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy and reliability of forensic handwriting comparisons.
    Hicklin RA; Eisenhart L; Richetelli N; Miller MD; Belcastro P; Burkes TM; Parks CL; Smith MA; Buscaglia J; Peters EM; Perlman RS; Abonamah JV; Eckenrode BA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(32):e2119944119. PubMed ID: 35914157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An insight into forensic document examiner expertise for discriminating between forged and disguised signatures.
    Dyer AG; Found B; Rogers D
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Sep; 53(5):1154-9. PubMed ID: 18624887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinguishing Characteristics of Robotic Writing.
    Dumitra A; Guzowski A; Jean A; Shaw M; Warmbier G; Zippo P
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):468-474. PubMed ID: 30118539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biasability and reliability of expert forensic document examiners.
    Dror IE; Scherr KC; Mohammed LA; MacLean CL; Cunningham L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110610. PubMed ID: 33358191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual attention and expertise for forensic signature analysis.
    Dyer AG; Found B; Rogers D
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1397-404. PubMed ID: 17199627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An examination of handwritten signatures forged using photosensitive signature stamp.
    Li Z; Liu X
    Forensic Sci Res; 2021; 6(2):168-182. PubMed ID: 34377575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Size influence on shape of handwritten characters loops.
    Marquis R; Taroni F; Bozza S; Schmittbuhl M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Oct; 172(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 17207594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of extrinsic motivation on signature authorship opinions in forensic signature blind trials.
    Dewhurst TN; Found B; Ballantyne KN; Rogers D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Mar; 236():127-32. PubMed ID: 24529783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A statistical approach to aid examiners in the forensic analysis of handwriting.
    Crawford AM; Ommen DM; Carriquiry AL
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Sep; 68(5):1768-1779. PubMed ID: 37449649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating forensic document examiners' skill relating to opinions on photocopied signatures.
    Found B; Rogers DK
    Sci Justice; 2005; 45(4):199-206. PubMed ID: 16686271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of an Automated System to Evaluate Feature Dissimilarities in Handwriting Under a Two-Stage Evaluative Process*
    Fuglsby C; Saunders C; Ommen DM; Caligiuri MP
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):2080-2086. PubMed ID: 32835414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. iVision HHID: Handwritten hyperspectral images dataset for benchmarking hyperspectral imaging-based document forensic analysis.
    Islam AU; Khan MJ; Asad M; Khan HA; Khurshid K
    Data Brief; 2022 Apr; 41():107964. PubMed ID: 35242944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A scale space approach for automatically segmenting words from historical handwritten documents.
    Manmatha R; Rothfeder JL
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2005 Aug; 27(8):1212-25. PubMed ID: 16119261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An efficient method to detect series of fraudulent identity documents based on digitised forensic data.
    Lugon Moulin S; Weyermann C; Baechler S
    Sci Justice; 2022 Sep; 62(5):610-620. PubMed ID: 36336454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.