301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26190187)
1. Impact of Dose-Modified Protocols on Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing CT Examinations following Image-Guided Catheter Placement.
Andrabi Y; Saadeh TS; Uppot RN; Arellano RS; Sahani DV
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1339-46.e1. PubMed ID: 26190187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiation Dose Consideration in Kidney Stone CT Examinations: Integration of Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms With Routine Clinical Practice.
Andrabi Y; Pianykh O; Agrawal M; Kambadakone A; Blake MA; Sahani DV
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):1055-63. PubMed ID: 25905941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of compressive sensing technique in dose reduction for chest computed tomography: a prospective blinded clinical study.
Khawaja RD; Singh S; Lira D; Bippus R; Do S; Padole A; Pourjabbar S; Koehler T; Shepard JA; Kalra MK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):760-7. PubMed ID: 24834892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of iterative reconstruction and automated tube voltage selection on the image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT scans.
Desai GS; Fuentes Orrego JM; Kambadakone AR; Sahani DV
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):897-903. PubMed ID: 24270111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation dose reduction with hybrid iterative reconstruction for pediatric CT.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Shenoy-Bhangle AS; Saini A; Gervais DA; Westra SJ; Thrall JH
Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):537-46. PubMed ID: 22517962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose-modified 256-MDCT of the abdomen using low tube current and hybrid iterative reconstruction.
Fuentes-Orrego JM; Hayano K; Kambadakone AR; Hahn PF; Sahani DV
Acad Radiol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1405-12. PubMed ID: 24119353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
Prakash P; Kalra MK; Kambadakone AK; Pien H; Hsieh J; Blake MA; Sahani DV
Invest Radiol; 2010 Apr; 45(4):202-10. PubMed ID: 20177389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Hsieh J; Licato PE; Do S; Pien HH; Blake MA
Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Successful Dose Reduction Using Reduced Tube Voltage With Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction in Pediatric Abdominal CT.
Berlin SC; Weinert DM; Vasavada PS; Martinez-Rios C; Parikh RA; Wien MA; Jordan DW; Novak RD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):392-9. PubMed ID: 26204293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low-dose CT examinations in Crohn's disease: Impact on image quality, diagnostic performance, and radiation dose.
Kambadakone AR; Prakash P; Hahn PF; Sahani DV
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 20566800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endoleak and in-stent thrombus detection with CT angiography in a thoracic aortic aneurysm phantom at different tube energies using filtered back projection and iterative algorithms.
Deák Z; Grimm JM; Mueck F; Geyer LL; Treitl M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
Radiology; 2014 May; 271(2):574-84. PubMed ID: 24475853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective Randomized Trial on Radiation Dose Estimates of CT Angiography Applying Iterative Image Reconstruction: The PROTECTION V Study.
Deseive S; Chen MY; Korosoglou G; Leipsic J; Martuscelli E; Carrascosa P; Mirsadraee S; White C; Hadamitzky M; Martinoff S; Menges AL; Bischoff B; Massberg S; Hausleiter J
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Aug; 8(8):888-96. PubMed ID: 26189118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultra low-dose chest CT using filtered back projection: comparison of 80-, 100- and 120 kVp protocols in a prospective randomized study.
Khawaja RD; Singh S; Madan R; Sharma A; Padole A; Pourjabbar S; Digumarthy S; Shepard JA; Kalra MK
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 83(10):1934-44. PubMed ID: 25063211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Submillisievert chest CT with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction techniques.
Padole A; Singh S; Ackman JB; Wu C; Do S; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Otrakji A; Digumarthy S; Shepard JA; Kalra M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):772-81. PubMed ID: 25247943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Survey of Radiation Doses in CT Urography Before and After Implementation of Iterative Reconstruction.
van der Molen AJ; Miclea RL; Geleijns J; Joemai RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):572-7. PubMed ID: 26295643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose in thoracic and abdominal CT.
Kalmar PI; Quehenberger F; Steiner J; Lutfi A; Bohlsen D; Talakic E; Hassler EM; Schöllnast H
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1416-20. PubMed ID: 24931921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Hosokawa T; Tanami Y; Sugiura H; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4185-95. PubMed ID: 22883532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
Sagara Y; Hara AK; Pavlicek W; Silva AC; Paden RG; Wu Q
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Introduction of an effective method for the optimization of CT protocols using iterative reconstruction algorithms: comparison with patient data.
Kordolaimi SD; Saradeas I; Ploussi A; Pantos I; Argentos S; Efstathopoulos EP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):W434-9. PubMed ID: 25247973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Thoracoabdominal-aortoiliac multidetector-row CT angiography at 80 and 100 kVp: assessment of image quality and radiation dose.
Schindera ST; Graca P; Patak MA; Abderhalden S; von Allmen G; Vock P; Szucs-Farkas Z
Invest Radiol; 2009 Oct; 44(10):650-5. PubMed ID: 19724236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
