These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26190480)

  • 1. Persistence of Initial Misanalysis With No Referential Ambiguity.
    Nakamura C; Arai M
    Cogn Sci; 2016 May; 40(4):909-40. PubMed ID: 26190480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Plausibility and structural reanalysis in L1 and L2 sentence comprehension.
    Lee J; Witzel J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Feb; 76(2):319-337. PubMed ID: 35319306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unforced Revision in Processing Relative Clause Association Ambiguity in Japanese: Evidence Against Revision as Last Resort.
    Yamada T; Arai M; Hirose Y
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Jun; 46(3):661-714. PubMed ID: 27866311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Wonnacott E; Joseph HS; Adelman JS; Nation K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):855-79. PubMed ID: 25774745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semantic re-interpretation and garden path recovery.
    Sturt P
    Cognition; 2007 Nov; 105(2):477-88. PubMed ID: 17178115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting the unbeaten path through syntactic priming.
    Arai M; Nakamura C; Mazuka R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):482-500. PubMed ID: 25528094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger.
    Christianson K; Hollingworth A; Halliwell JF; Ferreira F
    Cogn Psychol; 2001 Jun; 42(4):368-407. PubMed ID: 11368528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Plausibility and subcategorization preference in children's processing of temporarily ambiguous sentences: evidence from self-paced reading.
    Traxler MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):75-96. PubMed ID: 11873857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Garden-path sentences and the diversity of their (mis)representations.
    Ceháková M; Chromý J
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0288817. PubMed ID: 37463143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden-path recovery.
    Jacob G; Felser C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):907-25. PubMed ID: 25397360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses.
    Friederici AD; Steinhauer K; Mecklinger A; Meyer M
    Biol Psychol; 1998 Mar; 47(3):193-221. PubMed ID: 9564450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lingering misinterpretations in garden-path sentences: evidence from a paraphrasing task.
    Patson ND; Darowski ES; Moon N; Ferreira F
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):280-5. PubMed ID: 19210099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Online and offline inferential and textual processing of poor comprehenders: Evidence from a probing method.
    Yeari M; Elentok S; Schiff R
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Mar; 155():12-31. PubMed ID: 27894004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Online processing of sentences containing noun modification in young children with high-functioning autism.
    Bavin EL; Prendergast LA; Kidd E; Baker E; Dissanayake C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2016 Mar; 51(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 26215207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: evidence from self-paced reading.
    Swets B; Desmet T; Clifton C; Ferreira F
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jan; 36(1):201-16. PubMed ID: 18323075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An electrophysiological investigation of semantic and phonological processing in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders.
    Landi N; Perfetti CA
    Brain Lang; 2007 Jul; 102(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 17188346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coherence-driven resolution of referential ambiguity: a computational model.
    Frank SL; Koppen M; Noordman LG; Vonk W
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Sep; 35(6):1307-22. PubMed ID: 18035629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency.
    Spivey MJ; Tanenhaus MK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Nov; 24(6):1521-43. PubMed ID: 9835064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When readers fail to form a coherent representation of garden-path sentences.
    Chromý J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jan; 75(1):169-190. PubMed ID: 34289762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semantic ambiguity processing in sentence context: Evidence from event-related fMRI.
    Zempleni MZ; Renken R; Hoeks JC; Hoogduin JM; Stowe LA
    Neuroimage; 2007 Feb; 34(3):1270-9. PubMed ID: 17142061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.