These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26192841)

  • 1. Surface shape evaluation with a corneal topographer based on a conical null-screen with a novel radial point distribution.
    Campos-García M; Cossio-Guerrero C; Moreno-Oliva VI; Huerta-Carranza O
    Appl Opt; 2015 Jun; 54(17):5411-9. PubMed ID: 26192841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A review of mathematical descriptors of corneal asphericity].
    Gatinel D; Haouat M; Hoang-Xuan T
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2002 Jan; 25(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 11965125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative evaluation of an off-axis parabolic mirror by using a tilted null screen.
    Avendaño-Alejo M; Moreno-Oliva VI; Campos-García M; Díaz-Uribe R
    Appl Opt; 2009 Feb; 48(5):1008-15. PubMed ID: 19209218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance in specular reflection and slit-imaging corneal topography.
    Braaf B; Dubbelman M; van der Heijde RG; Sicam VA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 May; 86(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 19342978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Smartphone-based corneal topography with null-screens.
    Huerta-Carranza O; Campos-García M; Moreno-Oliva VI; Aguirre-Aguirre D; Pérez-Lomelí JS
    Appl Opt; 2022 Feb; 61(6):1381-1388. PubMed ID: 35201019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving fast aspheric convex surface tests with dynamic null screens using LCDs.
    Campos-García M; Moreno-Oliva VI; Díaz-Uribe R; Granados-Agustín F; Santiago-Alvarado A
    Appl Opt; 2011 Jul; 50(19):3101-9. PubMed ID: 21743508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Damped least-squares approach for point-source corneal topography.
    Sokurenko V; Molebny V
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 May; 29(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 19422565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Goodness-of-prediction of Zernike polynomial fitting to corneal surfaces.
    Smolek MK; Klyce SD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Dec; 31(12):2350-5. PubMed ID: 16473230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Corneal topographer based on the Hartmann test.
    Mejía Y; Galeano JC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Apr; 86(4):370-81. PubMed ID: 19347999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inverse Hartmann test for radius of curvature measurement in a corneal topography calibration sphere.
    Jalife-Chavira JM; Trujillo-Schiaffino G; Mendoza-Villegas PG; Salas-Peimbert DP; Anguiano-Morales M; Corral-Martínez LF; Tornero-Martínez N
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2022 Apr; 93(4):043101. PubMed ID: 35489901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Which soft contact lens power is better for piggyback fitting in keratoconus?
    Romero-Jiménez M; Santodomingo-Rubido J; Flores-Rodríguez P; González-Méijome JM
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Feb; 36(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 23108009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a wide field height eye topographer: validation on models of the anterior eye surface.
    Jongsma FH; de Brabander J; Hendrikse F; Stultiens BA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jan; 75(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 9460789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [An algorithm of corneal reconstruction based on precise location of corneal center].
    Zhou H; Shen J; Gao S; Tang Z
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 28(5):872-5, 885. PubMed ID: 22097246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Topographer reconstruction of the nonrotation-symmetric anterior corneal surface features.
    Sicam VA; VAN der Heijde RG
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 83(12):910-8. PubMed ID: 17164684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repeatability of internal aberrometry with a new simultaneous capture aberrometer/corneal topographer.
    Gifford P; Swarbrick HA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jun; 89(6):929-38. PubMed ID: 22543999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface coverage with single vs. multiple gaze surface topography to fit scleral lenses.
    DeNaeyer G; Sanders DR; Farajian TS
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Jun; 40(3):162-169. PubMed ID: 28336224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parametric fitting of corneal height data to a biconic surface.
    Janunts E; Kannengießer M; Langenbucher A
    Z Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 25(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 24656640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Corneal astigmatism measuring module for slit lamps.
    Ventura L; Riul C; Sousa SJ; De Groote JG; Rosa Filho AB; Oliveira GC
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(12):3085-98. PubMed ID: 16757864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Difference map or single elevation map in the evaluation of corneal forward shift after LASIK.
    Yoshida T; Miyata K; Tokunaga T; Tanabe T; Oshika T
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Oct; 110(10):1926-30. PubMed ID: 14522766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pseudo forward ray-tracing: a new method for surface validation in cornea topography.
    Sicam VA; Snellenburg JJ; van der Heijde RG; van Stokkum IH
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 84(9):915-23. PubMed ID: 17873765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.