207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26192956)
1. Correlation Between Euro NCAP Pedestrian Test Results and Injury Severity in Injury Crashes with Pedestrians and Bicyclists in Sweden.
Strandroth J; Sternlund S; Lie A; Tingvall C; Rizzi M; Kullgren A; Ohlin M; Fredriksson R
Stapp Car Crash J; 2014 Nov; 58():213-31. PubMed ID: 26192956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The correlation between pedestrian injury severity in real-life crashes and Euro NCAP pedestrian test results.
Strandroth J; Rizzi M; Sternlund S; Lie A; Tingvall C
Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 12(6):604-13. PubMed ID: 22133337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of Integrated Pedestrian Protection Systems with Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) and Passive Safety Components.
Edwards M; Nathanson A; Carroll J; Wisch M; Zander O; Lubbe N
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S2-S11. PubMed ID: 26027971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects on crash risk of automatic emergency braking systems for pedestrians and bicyclists.
Kullgren A; Amin K; Tingvall C
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(sup1):S111-S115. PubMed ID: 37267014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Have pedestrian subsystem tests improved passenger car front shape?
Li G; Wang F; Otte D; Cai Z; Simms C
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():143-150. PubMed ID: 29571012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of the mechanism of injury in non-fatal vehicle-to-pedestrian and vehicle-to-bicyclist frontal crashes in Sweden.
Öman M; Fredriksson R; Bylund PO; Björnstig U
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot; 2016 Dec; 23(4):405-412. PubMed ID: 26076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of improving vehicle front design on the burden of pedestrian injuries in Germany, the United States, and India.
Moran D; Bose D; Bhalla K
Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Nov; 18(8):832-838. PubMed ID: 28459283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Injury severity of pedestrians, bicyclists and motorcyclists resulting from crashes with reversing cars.
Decker S; Otte D; Cruz DL; Müller CW; Omar M; Krettek C; Brand S
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Sep; 94():46-51. PubMed ID: 27240128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimate of potential benefit for Europe of fitting Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) systems for pedestrian protection to passenger cars.
Edwards M; Nathanson A; Wisch M
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S173-82. PubMed ID: 25307384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A computational study on the basis for a safe speed limit for bicycles on shared paths considering the severity of pedestrian head injuries in bicyclist-pedestrian collisions.
Paudel M; Yap FF; Rosli TBM; Tan KH; Xu H; Vahdati N; Butt H; Shiryayev O
Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Oct; 176():106792. PubMed ID: 35952395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of collision damage mitigation braking systems and their effects on human injury in the event of car-to-pedestrian accidents.
Matsui Y; Han Y; Mizuno K
Stapp Car Crash J; 2011 Nov; 55():461-78. PubMed ID: 22869318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimated benefit of automated emergency braking systems for vehicle-pedestrian crashes in the United States.
Haus SH; Sherony R; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S171-S176. PubMed ID: 31381447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pedestrian injuries from cars and SUVs: Updated crash outcomes from the vulnerable road user injury prevention alliance (VIPA).
Monfort SS; Mueller BC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S165-S167. PubMed ID: 33147075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Research of fatal car-to-pedestrian precrash scenarios for the testing of the active safety system in China.
Tan Z; Che Y; Xiao L; Hu W; Li P; Xu J
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105857. PubMed ID: 33285448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characteristics of pedestrian injuries caused due to impacts with powered 2-wheelers in India.
Jayaraman A; Soni J; Baladaniya S; Rajaraman R; Patel M; Padmanaban J
Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S107-S111. PubMed ID: 33433239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A real-life based evaluation method of deployable vulnerable road user protection systems.
Fredriksson R; Dahlgren M; van Schijndel M; de Hair S; van Montfort S
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S183-9. PubMed ID: 25307385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The current status of road user injuries among the elderly in Germany: a medical and technical accident analysis.
Richter M; Pape HC; Otte D; Krettek C
J Trauma; 2005 Mar; 58(3):591-5. PubMed ID: 15761356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Priorities of pedestrian protection--a real-life study of severe injuries and car sources.
Fredriksson R; Rosén E; Kullgren A
Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1672-81. PubMed ID: 20728616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Severity of road crashes involving pedestrians in Metro Manila, Philippines.
Verzosa N; Miles R
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Sep; 94():216-26. PubMed ID: 27340839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pattern of pedestrian injuries in the city of Nairobi: implications for urban safety planning.
Ogendi J; Odero W; Mitullah W; Khayesi M
J Urban Health; 2013 Oct; 90(5):849-56. PubMed ID: 23430375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
