405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26193168)
1. The Ethical Challenges of Socially Responsible Science.
Resnik DB; Elliott KC
Account Res; 2016; 23(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 26193168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Teaching social responsibility: the Manhattan project. Commentary on "The Six Domains of Research".
Gilmer PJ; DuBois M
Sci Eng Ethics; 2002 Apr; 8(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 12092491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dual use and the ethical responsibility of scientists.
Ehni HJ
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008; 56(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 18512027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reasons scientists avoid thinking about ethics.
Wolpe PR
Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(6):1023-5. PubMed ID: 16777590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientists' Ethical Obligations and Social Responsibility for Nanotechnology Research.
Corley EA; Kim Y; Scheufele DA
Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Feb; 22(1):111-32. PubMed ID: 25721444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The social responsibilities of biological scientists.
Reiser SJ; Bulger RE
Sci Eng Ethics; 1997 Apr; 3(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 11657884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Dilemmas, ethics and intent--a commentary.
Downie RS
J Med Ethics; 1986 Dec; 12(4):210-1. PubMed ID: 11643948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Commentary on "The social responsibilities of biological scientists" (S.J. Reiser and R.E. Bulger).
Beckwith J; Geller LN
Sci Eng Ethics; 1997 Apr; 3(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 11657885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The ethical implications of the new research paradigm.
Scott P
Sci Eng Ethics; 2003 Jan; 9(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 12645231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Science and social responsibility in public health.
Weed DL; McKeown RE
Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Nov; 111(14):1804-8. PubMed ID: 14602514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Going public: good scientific conduct.
Meyer G; Sandøe P
Sci Eng Ethics; 2012 Jun; 18(2):173-97. PubMed ID: 21088921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives.
Wenger NS; Korenman SG; Berk R; Berry S
J Investig Med; 1997 Aug; 45(6):371-80. PubMed ID: 9291693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Making sense of scientists' responsibilities at the interface of science and society. Commentary on "Six Domains of Research Ethics".
Weil V
Sci Eng Ethics; 2002 Apr; 8(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 12092494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intellectual freedom and editorial responsibilities within the context of controversial research.
Pittenger DJ
Ethics Behav; 2003; 13(2):105-25. PubMed ID: 14552312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Coding ethical behaviour: the challenges of biological weapons.
Rappert B
Sci Eng Ethics; 2003 Oct; 9(4):453-70. PubMed ID: 14652899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Six Challenges for Ethical Conduct in Science.
Niemi P
Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Aug; 22(4):1007-1025. PubMed ID: 26154418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Science, ethics and war: a pacifist's perspective.
Kovac J
Sci Eng Ethics; 2013 Jun; 19(2):449-60. PubMed ID: 22371032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Objectivity and ethics in environmental health science.
Wing S
Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Nov; 111(14):1809-18. PubMed ID: 14594636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Facing the Pariah of Science: The Frankenstein Myth as a Social and Ethical Reference for Scientists.
Nagy P; Wylie R; Eschrich J; Finn E
Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Apr; 26(2):737-759. PubMed ID: 31292834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Why science cannot be value-free: understanding the rationality and responsibility of science.
Lekka-Kowalik A
Sci Eng Ethics; 2010 Mar; 16(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 19343542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
