These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2619334)

  • 1. The efficiency of the cytobrush and cotton swab in obtaining endocervical cells in smears taken after conization of the cervix.
    Kristensen GB; Jensen LK; Ejersbo D; Hølund B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 246(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 2619334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
    Davey-Sullivan B; Gearhart J; Evers CG; Cason Z; Replogle WH
    Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB; Hølund B; Grinsted P
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
    Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush.
    Partoll LM; Javaheri G
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical cytology: a randomized comparison of four sampling methods.
    McCord ML; Stovall TG; Meric JL; Summitt RL; Coleman SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 166(6 Pt 1):1772-7; discussion 1777-9. PubMed ID: 1615986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
    Chalvardjian A; De Marchi WG; Bell V; Nishikawa R
    CMAJ; 1991 Feb; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
    Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Pretorius RG; Sadeghi M; Fotheringham N; Semrad N; Watring WG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endocervical detection of CIN. Cytobrush versus cotton.
    Schettino F; Sideri M; Cangini L; Candiani M; Zannoni E; Maggi R; Ferrari A
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1993; 14(3):234-6. PubMed ID: 8508881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized trial comparing two methods of cold knife conization with laser conization.
    Kristensen GB; Jensen LK; Hølund B
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 76(6):1009-13. PubMed ID: 2234708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of the Cytobrush in patients at risk for cervical pathology: does it add anything to the wooden spatula?
    Van Erp EJ; Blaschek-Lut CH; Arentz NP; Trimbos JB
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1988; 9(6):456-60. PubMed ID: 3234423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should the Cytobrush be used in routine screening for cervical pathology?
    van Erp EJ; Dersjant-Roorda MC; Arentz NP; Stijnen T; Trimbos JB
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Oct; 30(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 2572484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contribution of the cytobrush to determining cellular composition of cervical smears.
    Doornewaard H; van der Graaf Y
    J Clin Pathol; 1990 May; 43(5):393-6. PubMed ID: 2370307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
    Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
    Koonings PP; Dickinson K; d'Ablaing G; Schlaerth JB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears in pregnancy.
    Rivlin ME; Woodliff JM; Bowlin RB; Moore JL; Martin RW; Grossman JH; Morrison JC
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Feb; 38(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 8445608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The unicum and cytobrush plus spatula for cervical cytologic sampling: a comparison.
    Broso PR; Buffetti G; Fabbrini T; Francone P; Orlassino R
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(2):222-5. PubMed ID: 8629402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
    Cannon JM; Blythe JG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush.
    Lo L; Jordan J
    Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.