These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26193934)

  • 1. Impact of genetic similarity on imputation accuracy.
    Roshyara NR; Scholz M
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():90. PubMed ID: 26193934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comprehensive evaluation of imputation performance in African Americans.
    Chanda P; Yuhki N; Li M; Bader JS; Hartz A; Boerwinkle E; Kao WH; Arking DE
    J Hum Genet; 2012 Jul; 57(7):411-21. PubMed ID: 22648186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing performance of modern genotype imputation methods in different ethnicities.
    Roshyara NR; Horn K; Kirsten H; Ahnert P; Scholz M
    Sci Rep; 2016 Oct; 6():34386. PubMed ID: 27698363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of genotype imputation performance using 1000 Genomes in African American studies.
    Hancock DB; Levy JL; Gaddis NC; Bierut LJ; Saccone NL; Page GP; Johnson EO
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e50610. PubMed ID: 23226329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation of untyped markers and impacts on statistical power for association studies.
    Hao K; Chudin E; McElwee J; Schadt EE
    BMC Genet; 2009 Jun; 10():27. PubMed ID: 19531258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of imputation using the most common sires as reference population in layer chickens.
    Heidaritabar M; Calus MP; Vereijken A; Groenen MA; Bastiaansen JW
    BMC Genet; 2015 Aug; 16():101. PubMed ID: 26282557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of genotype imputation based on random and selected reference sets in purebred and crossbred sheep populations and its effect on accuracy of genomic prediction.
    Moghaddar N; Gore KP; Daetwyler HD; Hayes BJ; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():97. PubMed ID: 26694131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the accuracy of imputed sequence variant genotypes and their utility for causal variant detection in cattle.
    Pausch H; MacLeod IM; Fries R; Emmerling R; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Goddard ME
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):24. PubMed ID: 28222685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of genotype imputation strategies using a combined reference panel for chicken population.
    Ye S; Yuan X; Huang S; Zhang H; Chen Z; Li J; Zhang X; Zhang Z
    Animal; 2019 Jun; 13(6):1119-1126. PubMed ID: 30370890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genotype imputation for African Americans using data from HapMap phase II versus 1000 genomes projects.
    Sung YJ; Gu CC; Tiwari HK; Arnett DK; Broeckel U; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 36(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 22644746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multi-generational imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes and accuracy of genomic selection.
    Toghiani S; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
    Animal; 2016 Jul; 10(7):1077-85. PubMed ID: 27076192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comprehensive evaluation of SNP genotype imputation.
    Nothnagel M; Ellinghaus D; Schreiber S; Krawczak M; Franke A
    Hum Genet; 2009 Mar; 125(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 19089453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Practical considerations for imputation of untyped markers in admixed populations.
    Shriner D; Adeyemo A; Chen G; Rotimi CN
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 34(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 19918757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DISTMIX: direct imputation of summary statistics for unmeasured SNPs from mixed ethnicity cohorts.
    Lee D; Bigdeli TB; Williamson VS; Vladimirov VI; Riley BP; Fanous AH; Bacanu SA
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Oct; 31(19):3099-104. PubMed ID: 26059716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rare variant genotype imputation with thousands of study-specific whole-genome sequences: implications for cost-effective study designs.
    Pistis G; Porcu E; Vrieze SI; Sidore C; Steri M; Danjou F; Busonero F; Mulas A; Zoledziewska M; Maschio A; Brennan C; Lai S; Miller MB; Marcelli M; Urru MF; Pitzalis M; Lyons RH; Kang HM; Jones CM; Angius A; Iacono WG; Schlessinger D; McGue M; Cucca F; Abecasis GR; Sanna S
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2015 Jul; 23(7):975-83. PubMed ID: 25293720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of genome-wide genotyping and reference panels on rare variants imputation.
    Zheng HF; Ladouceur M; Greenwood CM; Richards JB
    J Genet Genomics; 2012 Oct; 39(10):545-50. PubMed ID: 23089364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comprehensive Assessment of Genotype Imputation Performance.
    Shi S; Yuan N; Yang M; Du Z; Wang J; Sheng X; Wu J; Xiao J
    Hum Hered; 2018; 83(3):107-116. PubMed ID: 30669139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating the accuracy of imputing autosomal variants in Nellore cattle using the ARS-UCD1.2 assembly of the bovine genome.
    Hermisdorff IDC; Costa RB; de Albuquerque LG; Pausch H; Kadri NK
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Nov; 21(1):772. PubMed ID: 33167856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of pre-imputation SNP-filtering on genotype imputation results.
    Roshyara NR; Kirsten H; Horn K; Ahnert P; Scholz M
    BMC Genet; 2014 Aug; 15():88. PubMed ID: 25112433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of genotype imputation in Nelore cattle.
    Carvalheiro R; Boison SA; Neves HH; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS; Utsunomiya YT; O'Brien AM; Sölkner J; McEwan JC; Van Tassell CP; Sonstegard TS; Garcia JF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):69. PubMed ID: 25927950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.