BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26193934)

  • 1. Impact of genetic similarity on imputation accuracy.
    Roshyara NR; Scholz M
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():90. PubMed ID: 26193934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comprehensive evaluation of imputation performance in African Americans.
    Chanda P; Yuhki N; Li M; Bader JS; Hartz A; Boerwinkle E; Kao WH; Arking DE
    J Hum Genet; 2012 Jul; 57(7):411-21. PubMed ID: 22648186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing performance of modern genotype imputation methods in different ethnicities.
    Roshyara NR; Horn K; Kirsten H; Ahnert P; Scholz M
    Sci Rep; 2016 Oct; 6():34386. PubMed ID: 27698363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of genotype imputation performance using 1000 Genomes in African American studies.
    Hancock DB; Levy JL; Gaddis NC; Bierut LJ; Saccone NL; Page GP; Johnson EO
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e50610. PubMed ID: 23226329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation of untyped markers and impacts on statistical power for association studies.
    Hao K; Chudin E; McElwee J; Schadt EE
    BMC Genet; 2009 Jun; 10():27. PubMed ID: 19531258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of imputation using the most common sires as reference population in layer chickens.
    Heidaritabar M; Calus MP; Vereijken A; Groenen MA; Bastiaansen JW
    BMC Genet; 2015 Aug; 16():101. PubMed ID: 26282557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of genotype imputation based on random and selected reference sets in purebred and crossbred sheep populations and its effect on accuracy of genomic prediction.
    Moghaddar N; Gore KP; Daetwyler HD; Hayes BJ; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():97. PubMed ID: 26694131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the accuracy of imputed sequence variant genotypes and their utility for causal variant detection in cattle.
    Pausch H; MacLeod IM; Fries R; Emmerling R; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Goddard ME
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):24. PubMed ID: 28222685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of genotype imputation strategies using a combined reference panel for chicken population.
    Ye S; Yuan X; Huang S; Zhang H; Chen Z; Li J; Zhang X; Zhang Z
    Animal; 2019 Jun; 13(6):1119-1126. PubMed ID: 30370890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genotype imputation for African Americans using data from HapMap phase II versus 1000 genomes projects.
    Sung YJ; Gu CC; Tiwari HK; Arnett DK; Broeckel U; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 36(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 22644746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multi-generational imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes and accuracy of genomic selection.
    Toghiani S; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
    Animal; 2016 Jul; 10(7):1077-85. PubMed ID: 27076192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comprehensive evaluation of SNP genotype imputation.
    Nothnagel M; Ellinghaus D; Schreiber S; Krawczak M; Franke A
    Hum Genet; 2009 Mar; 125(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 19089453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Practical considerations for imputation of untyped markers in admixed populations.
    Shriner D; Adeyemo A; Chen G; Rotimi CN
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 34(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 19918757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DISTMIX: direct imputation of summary statistics for unmeasured SNPs from mixed ethnicity cohorts.
    Lee D; Bigdeli TB; Williamson VS; Vladimirov VI; Riley BP; Fanous AH; Bacanu SA
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Oct; 31(19):3099-104. PubMed ID: 26059716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rare variant genotype imputation with thousands of study-specific whole-genome sequences: implications for cost-effective study designs.
    Pistis G; Porcu E; Vrieze SI; Sidore C; Steri M; Danjou F; Busonero F; Mulas A; Zoledziewska M; Maschio A; Brennan C; Lai S; Miller MB; Marcelli M; Urru MF; Pitzalis M; Lyons RH; Kang HM; Jones CM; Angius A; Iacono WG; Schlessinger D; McGue M; Cucca F; Abecasis GR; Sanna S
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2015 Jul; 23(7):975-83. PubMed ID: 25293720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of genome-wide genotyping and reference panels on rare variants imputation.
    Zheng HF; Ladouceur M; Greenwood CM; Richards JB
    J Genet Genomics; 2012 Oct; 39(10):545-50. PubMed ID: 23089364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comprehensive Assessment of Genotype Imputation Performance.
    Shi S; Yuan N; Yang M; Du Z; Wang J; Sheng X; Wu J; Xiao J
    Hum Hered; 2018; 83(3):107-116. PubMed ID: 30669139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating the accuracy of imputing autosomal variants in Nellore cattle using the ARS-UCD1.2 assembly of the bovine genome.
    Hermisdorff IDC; Costa RB; de Albuquerque LG; Pausch H; Kadri NK
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Nov; 21(1):772. PubMed ID: 33167856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of pre-imputation SNP-filtering on genotype imputation results.
    Roshyara NR; Kirsten H; Horn K; Ahnert P; Scholz M
    BMC Genet; 2014 Aug; 15():88. PubMed ID: 25112433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of genotype imputation in Nelore cattle.
    Carvalheiro R; Boison SA; Neves HH; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS; Utsunomiya YT; O'Brien AM; Sölkner J; McEwan JC; Van Tassell CP; Sonstegard TS; Garcia JF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):69. PubMed ID: 25927950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.