BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26194725)

  • 21. Factorial design provides evidence to guide practice of anaesthesia.
    Korttila K; Apfel CC
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Aug; 49(7):927-9. PubMed ID: 16045652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
    Leibovici L; Reeves D
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2005 Nov; 56(5):803-4. PubMed ID: 16166177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Observational studies in the era of randomized trials: finding the balance.
    Castillo RC; Scharfstein DO; MacKenzie EJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94 Suppl 1():112-7. PubMed ID: 22810460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Many reviews are systematic but some are more transparent and completely reported than others.
    PLoS Medicine Editors
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e147. PubMed ID: 17388685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Levels of evidence of articles published in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine journals.
    Paci M; Briganti G; Lombardi B
    J Rehabil Med; 2011 Feb; 43(3):264-7. PubMed ID: 21394416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The randomised controlled trial to meta-analysis ratio: original data versus systematic reviews in the medical literature.
    Bolland MJ; Grey A; Reid IR
    N Z Med J; 2007 Nov; 120(1265):U2804. PubMed ID: 18264184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What is Wrong With Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: If You Want the Right Answer, Ask the Right Question!
    Thoma A; Eaves FF
    Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Nov; 36(10):1198-1201. PubMed ID: 27756743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The end of biomedical journals: there is madness in their methods.
    Aickin M
    J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Oct; 11(5):755-7. PubMed ID: 16296895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A 30 year perspective of the quality of evidence published in 25 clinical journals: signs of change?
    Gnanalingham MG; Robinson SG; Hawley DP; Gnanalingham KK
    Postgrad Med J; 2006 Jun; 82(968):397-9. PubMed ID: 16754709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.
    Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR
    Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evidence-based reviews and meta-analysis.
    Evans J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 May; 149(5):701-3. PubMed ID: 20399923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials: principles and pitfalls.
    da Costa BR; Juni P
    Eur Heart J; 2014 Dec; 35(47):3336-45. PubMed ID: 25416325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reflections on meta-analyses involving trials stopped early for benefit: is there a problem and if so, what is it?
    Bassler D; Montori VM; Briel M; Glasziou P; Walter SD; Ramsay T; Guyatt G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2013 Apr; 22(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 22170891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Empirical assessment suggests that existing evidence could be used more fully in designing randomized controlled trials.
    Goudie AC; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Donald A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 63(9):983-91. PubMed ID: 20573483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bibliographic study showed improving methodology of meta-analyses published in leading journals 1993-2002.
    Gerber S; Tallon D; Trelle S; Schneider M; Jüni P; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 60(8):773-80. PubMed ID: 17606172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Meta-analysis in medicine: an introduction.
    Mak A; Cheung MW; Fu EH; Ho RC
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2010 May; 13(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 20536593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Systematic reviews of surgical interventions.
    Burton M; Clarke M
    Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Feb; 86(1):101-14, ix. PubMed ID: 16442423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Clinical decision-making: systematic reviews and meta-analysis].
    Fernández Pérez C
    Neurologia; 2003 Mar; 18(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 12610756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Randomized trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses: basic criteria in the world of scientific evidence].
    Purgato M; Cipriani A; Barbui C
    Riv Psichiatr; 2012; 47(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 22358214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.