226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26195253)
1. The Social Value of Knowledge and International Clinical Research.
Wenner DM
Dev World Bioeth; 2015 Aug; 15(2):76-84. PubMed ID: 26195253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A framework to link international clinical research to the promotion of justice in global health.
Pratt B; Loff B
Bioethics; 2014 Oct; 28(8):387-96. PubMed ID: 23278523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. For-profit clinical trials in developing countries--those troublesome patient benefits.
Schuklenk U
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):52-4. PubMed ID: 20526975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Justice in the application of science: beyond fair benefits.
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):54-6. PubMed ID: 20526976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Should Social Value Obligations be Local or Global?
Nayak R; Shah SK
Bioethics; 2017 Feb; 31(2):116-127. PubMed ID: 28060432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How to do research fairly in an unjust world.
Ballantyne AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):26-35. PubMed ID: 20526966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Response to open peer commentaries on "How to do research fairly in an unjust world".
Ballantyne AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):W4-6. PubMed ID: 20526959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The perverse consequences of a proposed global tax on research.
MacDonald C; Walton N
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):46-7. PubMed ID: 20526972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Social Value of Knowledge and the Responsiveness Requirement for International Research.
Wenner DM
Bioethics; 2017 Feb; 31(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 28060431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Off-shoring clinical research: exploitation and the reciprocity constraint.
Mitra AG
Dev World Bioeth; 2013 Dec; 13(3):111-8. PubMed ID: 22708740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fair benefits in developing countries: maximin as a good start.
Macklin R
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):36-7. PubMed ID: 20526967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Practical and political problems with a global research tax.
Resnik DB
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):44-5. PubMed ID: 20526971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Viewing benefit sharing in global health research through the lens of Aristotelian justice.
Dauda B; Dierickx K
J Med Ethics; 2017 Jun; 43(6):417-421. PubMed ID: 28550158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Justifying community benefit requirements in international research.
Hughes RC
Bioethics; 2014 Oct; 28(8):397-404. PubMed ID: 23025255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why adopt a maximin theory of exploitation?
Wertheimer A; Millum J; Schaefer GO
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):38-9. PubMed ID: 20526968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of justice frameworks for international research.
Pratt B; Loff B
J Med Ethics; 2015 Jul; 41(7):539-44. PubMed ID: 25378552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Engaging diverse social and cultural worlds: perspectives on benefits in international clinical research from South african communities.
Zvonareva O; Engel N; Ross E; Berghmans R; Dhai A; Krumeich A
Dev World Bioeth; 2015 Apr; 15(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 23725088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Justice in international clinical research.
Pratt B; Loff B
Dev World Bioeth; 2011 Aug; 11(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 21118352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Community engagement and the human infrastructure of global health research.
King KF; Kolopack P; Merritt MW; Lavery JV
BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Dec; 15():84. PubMed ID: 25495054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Inequalities of access to care and in participation in research on a worldwide level: ethical problems].
France. Comite consultatif national d'ethique pour les sciences de la vie et de la sante
J Int Bioethique; 2005; 16(3-4):152-3. PubMed ID: 17058809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
