These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations. Gomersall JS; Jadotte YT; Xue Y; Lockwood S; Riddle D; Preda A Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26288063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Innovations in the systematic review of text and opinion. McArthur A; Klugárová J; Yan H; Florescu S Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 26207851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data. Munn Z; Moola S; Lisy K; Riitano D; Tufanaru C Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 26317388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic test accuracy: methods for systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell JM; Klugar M; Ding S; Carmody DP; Hakonsen SJ; Jadotte YT; White S; Munn Z Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):154-62. PubMed ID: 26355602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. Lockwood C; Munn Z; Porritt K Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 26262565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An Evidence-Based Approach to Scoping Reviews. Khalil H; Peters M; Godfrey CM; McInerney P; Soares CB; Parker D Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2016 Apr; 13(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 26821833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence. Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fixed or random effects meta-analysis? Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness. Tufanaru C; Munn Z; Stephenson M; Aromataris E Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):196-207. PubMed ID: 26355603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Impact of Evidence-Based Medicine on Qualitative Metasynthesis: Benefits to be Harvested and Warnings to be Given. Malterud K Qual Health Res; 2019 Jan; 29(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 30160202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Synthesis of qualitative research and evidence-based nursing. Flemming K Br J Nurs; 2007 May 24-Jun 13; 16(10):616-20. PubMed ID: 17577168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature. Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Promoting development and use of systematic reviews in a developing country. Yousefi-Nooraie R; Rashidian A; Nedjat S; Majdzadeh R; Mortaz-Hedjri S; Etemadi A; Salmasian H J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1029-34. PubMed ID: 20367702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A practical overview of how to conduct a systematic review. Davis D Nurs Stand; 2016 Nov; 31(12):60-71. PubMed ID: 27897766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A scoping approach to systematically review published reviews: Adaptations and recommendations. Schultz A; Goertzen L; Rothney J; Wener P; Enns J; Halas G; Katz A Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):116-123. PubMed ID: 29032590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Joanna Briggs Institute approach for systematic reviews. Santos WMD; Secoli SR; Püschel VAA Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2018 Nov; 26():e3074. PubMed ID: 30462787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]