BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26196135)

  • 21. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: a valuable alternative to open oesophagectomy for the treatment of early oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma.
    Nafteux P; Moons J; Coosemans W; Decaluwé H; Decker G; De Leyn P; Van Raemdonck D; Lerut T
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1455-63; discussion 1463-4. PubMed ID: 21514837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Outcomes after totally minimally invasive versus hybrid and open Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: results from the International Esodata Study Group.
    van der Wilk BJ; Hagens ERC; Eyck BM; Gisbertz SS; van Hillegersberg R; Nafteux P; Schröder W; Nilsson M; Wijnhoven BPL; Lagarde SM; van Berge Henegouwen MI;
    Br J Surg; 2022 Feb; 109(3):283-290. PubMed ID: 35024794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Omentoplasty in the prevention of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy: a meta-analysis.
    Chen L; Liu F; Wang K; Zou W
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1635-40. PubMed ID: 25220157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical outcomes of oesophagectomy in elderly versus relatively younger patients: a meta-analysis.
    Han Y; Liu S; Guo W; Zhang Y; Li H
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2019 Dec; 29(6):897-905. PubMed ID: 31765482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
    Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Population-based study of anastomotic stricture rates after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy for cancer.
    Helminen O; Kytö V; Kauppila JH; Gunn J; Lagergren J; Sihvo E
    BJS Open; 2019 Oct; 3(5):634-640. PubMed ID: 31592081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Minimally invasive surgical techniques for oesophageal cancer and nutritional recovery: a prospective population-based cohort study.
    Kauppila JH; Rosenlund H; Klevebro F; Johar A; Anandavadivelan P; Mälberg K; Lagergren P
    BMJ Open; 2022 Sep; 12(9):e058763. PubMed ID: 36581984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Biere SS; Cuesta MA; van der Peet DL
    Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 19365313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Minimally invasive surgery for oesophageal cancer.
    Anderegg MC; Gisbertz SS; van Berge Henegouwen MI
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 24485254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Single-incision laparo-thoracoscopic minimally invasive oesophagectomy to treat oesophageal cancer†.
    Lee JM; Yang SM; Yang PW; Huang PM
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():i59-63. PubMed ID: 26547093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection.
    Parameswaran R; Veeramootoo D; Krishnadas R; Cooper M; Berrisford R; Wajed S
    World J Surg; 2009 Sep; 33(9):1868-75. PubMed ID: 19609827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Advantages of McKeown minimally invasive oesophagectomy for the treatment of oesophageal cancer: propensity score matching analysis of 169 cases.
    Xie J; Zhang L; Liu Z; Lu CL; Xu GH; Guo M; Lian X; Liu JQ; Zhang HW; Zheng SY
    World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Feb; 20(1):52. PubMed ID: 35216598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: current status and future direction.
    Butler N; Collins S; Memon B; Memon MA
    Surg Endosc; 2011 Jul; 25(7):2071-83. PubMed ID: 21298548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Short-term outcomes after minimally invasive oesophagectomy.
    Ainsworth AP; Larsen MH; Ladegaard L; Eckardt J; Fristrup CW; Mortensen MB
    Dan Med J; 2019 Aug; 66(8):. PubMed ID: 31315797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use of oesophageal flap valvuloplasty and wrapping suturing technique in preventing postoperative complications after oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.
    Liu QX; Deng XF; Wang JS; Hou B; Li JM; Min JX; Dai JG
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1355-60. PubMed ID: 24835379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy in Wales.
    Chan DS; Baker AL
    Surgeon; 2016 Aug; 14(4):196-201. PubMed ID: 25596667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Early outcomes with robot-assisted vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of matched studies.
    Huang Y; Zhao YL; Song JD
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2021 Dec; 25(24):7887-7897. PubMed ID: 34982451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy is a feasible and safe approach for patients with oesophageal cancer.
    Mei X; Xu M; Guo M; Xie M; Liu C; Wang Z
    ANZ J Surg; 2016 Apr; 86(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 25962993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer.
    Safranek PM; Cubitt J; Booth MI; Dehn TC
    Br J Surg; 2010 Dec; 97(12):1845-53. PubMed ID: 20922782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy in the prone versus lateral decubitus position: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schizas D; Papaconstantinou D; Krompa A; Athanasiou A; Triantafyllou T; Tsekrekos A; Ruurda JP; Rouvelas I
    Dis Esophagus; 2022 Apr; 35(4):. PubMed ID: 34175947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.