These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26196508)

  • 1. Effects of Adaptation Rate and Noise Suppression on the Intelligibility of Compressed-Envelope Based Speech.
    Lai YH; Tsao Y; Chen F
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0133519. PubMed ID: 26196508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of noise suppression and envelope dynamic range compression on the intelligibility of vocoded sentences for a tonal language.
    Chen F; Zheng D; Tsao Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Sep; 142(3):1157. PubMed ID: 28964090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech: Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners.
    Bhargava P; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 17(5):475-91. PubMed ID: 27090115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded speech.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 21206363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Deep Denoising Autoencoder Approach to Improving the Intelligibility of Vocoded Speech in Cochlear Implant Simulation.
    Lai YH; Chen F; Wang SS; Lu X; Tsao Y; Lee CH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Jul; 64(7):1568-1578. PubMed ID: 28113304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deep Learning-Based Noise Reduction Approach to Improve Speech Intelligibility for Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Lai YH; Tsao Y; Lu X; Chen F; Su YT; Chen KC; Chen YH; Chen LC; Po-Hung Li L; Lee CH
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):795-809. PubMed ID: 29360687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relative importance of temporal envelope information for intelligibility prediction: a study on cochlear-implant vocoded speech.
    Chen F
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Oct; 33(8):1033-8. PubMed ID: 21546304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of an Adaptive Dynamic Compensation System in Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Langner F; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520970349. PubMed ID: 33356927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sparse Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Strategy for Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Lutman ME; Ewert SD; Li G; Bleeck S
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
    Qazi OU; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ideal time-frequency masking algorithms lead to different speech intelligibility and quality in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Koning R; Madhu N; Wouters J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 62(1):331-41. PubMed ID: 25167542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combination and Comparison of Sound Coding Strategies Using Cochlear Implant Simulation With Mandarin Speech.
    Huang EH; Wu CM; Lin HC
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2021; 29():2407-2416. PubMed ID: 34767509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech-in-noise enhancement using amplification and dynamic range compression controlled by the speech intelligibility index.
    Schepker H; Rennies J; Doclo S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):2692-706. PubMed ID: 26627746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of S-shaped input-output functions for noise suppression in cochlear implants.
    Kasturi K; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 17485989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-rate envelope information in many channels provides resistance to reduction of speech intelligibility produced by multi-channel fast-acting compression.
    Stone MA; Füllgrabe C; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2155-8. PubMed ID: 19894794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective intelligibility measurement of reverberant vocoded speech for normal-hearing listeners: Towards facilitating the development of speech enhancement algorithms for cochlear implants.
    Shahidi LK; Collins LM; Mainsah BO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Mar; 155(3):2151-2168. PubMed ID: 38501923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.
    Spriet A; Van Deun L; Eftaxiadis K; Laneau J; Moonen M; van Dijk B; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 17204899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
    Koning R; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vocoder simulations of highly focused cochlear stimulation with limited dynamic range and discriminable steps.
    Stafford RC; Stafford JW; Wells JD; Loizou PC; Keller MD
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):262-70. PubMed ID: 24322978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.