These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26197151)

  • 1. What Can Interaction Webs Tell Us About Species Roles?
    Sander EL; Wootton JT; Allesina S
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Jul; 11(7):e1004330. PubMed ID: 26197151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More than a meal… integrating non-feeding interactions into food webs.
    Kéfi S; Berlow EL; Wieters EA; Navarrete SA; Petchey OL; Wood SA; Boit A; Joppa LN; Lafferty KD; Williams RJ; Martinez ND; Menge BA; Blanchette CA; Iles AC; Brose U
    Ecol Lett; 2012 Apr; 15(4):291-300. PubMed ID: 22313549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Food-web complexity emerging from ecological dynamics on adaptive networks.
    Garcia-Domingo JL; Saldaña J
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Aug; 247(4):819-26. PubMed ID: 17512552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ecosystem function in predator-prey food webs-confronting dynamic models with empirical data.
    Curtsdotter A; Banks HT; Banks JE; Jonsson M; Jonsson T; Laubmeier AN; Traugott M; Bommarco R
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Feb; 88(2):196-210. PubMed ID: 30079547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Defining and measuring trophic role similarity in food webs using regular equivalence.
    Luczkovich JJ; Borgatti SP; Johnson JC; Everett MG
    J Theor Biol; 2003 Feb; 220(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 12468282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predator diversity and environmental change modify the strengths of trophic and nontrophic interactions.
    Sentis A; Gémard C; Jaugeon B; Boukal DS
    Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Jul; 23(7):2629-2640. PubMed ID: 27862723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generalized models reveal stabilizing factors in food webs.
    Gross T; Rudolf L; Levin SA; Dieckmann U
    Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5941):747-50. PubMed ID: 19661430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the effects of trophic complexity on a keystone predator by disassembling a partial intraguild predation food web.
    Davenport JM; Chalcraft DR
    J Anim Ecol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):242-50. PubMed ID: 21950407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relation between complexity and stability in food webs with adaptive behavior.
    Uchida S; Drossel B
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Aug; 247(4):713-22. PubMed ID: 17543344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying a common backbone of interactions underlying food webs from different ecosystems.
    Bramon Mora B; Gravel D; Gilarranz LJ; Poisot T; Stouffer DB
    Nat Commun; 2018 Jul; 9(1):2603. PubMed ID: 29973596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Serengeti food web: empirical quantification and analysis of topological changes under increasing human impact.
    de Visser SN; Freymann BP; Olff H
    J Anim Ecol; 2011 Mar; 80(2):484-94. PubMed ID: 21155772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Foundation species enhance food web complexity through non-trophic facilitation.
    Borst ACW; Verberk WCEP; Angelini C; Schotanus J; Wolters JW; Christianen MJA; van der Zee EM; Derksen-Hooijberg M; van der Heide T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0199152. PubMed ID: 30169517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interaction diversity within quantified insect food webs in restored and adjacent intensively managed meadows.
    Albrecht M; Duelli P; Schmid B; Müller CB
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Sep; 76(5):1015-25. PubMed ID: 17714280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scaling relations in food webs.
    Barbosa LA; Castro e Silva A; da Silva JK
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2006 Apr; 73(4 Pt 1):041903. PubMed ID: 16711832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Degree heterogeneity and stability of ecological networks.
    Yan G; Martinez ND; Liu YY
    J R Soc Interface; 2017 Jun; 14(131):. PubMed ID: 28637917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolutionary food web model based on body masses gives realistic networks with permanent species turnover.
    Allhoff KT; Ritterskamp D; Rall BC; Drossel B; Guill C
    Sci Rep; 2015 Jun; 5():10955. PubMed ID: 26042870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nontrophic interactions, biodiversity, and ecosystem functioning: an interaction web model.
    Goudard A; Loreau M
    Am Nat; 2008 Jan; 171(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 18171154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Compilation and network analyses of cambrian food webs.
    Dunne JA; Williams RJ; Martinez ND; Wood RA; Erwin DH
    PLoS Biol; 2008 Apr; 6(4):e102. PubMed ID: 18447582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic variation, predator-prey interactions and food web structure.
    Moya-Laraño J
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2011 May; 366(1569):1425-37. PubMed ID: 21444316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concomitant predation on parasites is highly variable but constrains the ways in which parasites contribute to food web structure.
    Cirtwill AR; Stouffer DB
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 May; 84(3):734-744. PubMed ID: 25418425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.