213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26197360)
1. Disentangling fast and slow attentional influences of negative and taboo spoken words in the emotional Stroop paradigm.
Bertels J; Kolinsky R
Cogn Emot; 2016 Sep; 30(6):1137-48. PubMed ID: 26197360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-lasting attentional influence of negative and taboo words in an auditory variant of the emotional Stroop task.
Bertels J; Kolinsky R; Pietrons E; Morais J
Emotion; 2011 Feb; 11(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 21401222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hearing taboo words can result in early talker effects in word recognition for female listeners.
Tuft SE; MᶜLennan CT; Krestar ML
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):435-448. PubMed ID: 27784198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Emotional valence of spoken words influences the spatial orienting of attention.
Bertels J; Kolinsky R; Morais J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):264-78. PubMed ID: 20347063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of emotional experience for abstract words in the Stroop task.
Siakaluk PD; Knol N; Pexman PM
Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(8):1698-717. PubMed ID: 24964820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aging, Emotion, Attention, and Binding in the Taboo Stroop Task: Data and Theories.
MacKay DG; Johnson LW; Graham ER; Burke DM
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Oct; 12(10):12803-33. PubMed ID: 26473909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of taboo-related distraction on driving performance.
Chan M; Madan CR; Singhal A
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jul; 168():20-6. PubMed ID: 27136396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decomposing the emotional Stroop effect.
Frings C; Englert J; Wentura D; Bermeitinger C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 19691003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lack of habituation to shocking words: the attentional bias to their spatial origin is context free.
Bertels J; Kolinsky R; Morais J
Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(8):1345-58. PubMed ID: 22432532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reactions of religious fundamentalists to taboo images and words.
Bates LW; Hudiburg RA; Lauderdale EP; Castillo JR
Psychol Rep; 2013 Aug; 113(1):1085-108. PubMed ID: 24340802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of recent word exposure on emotion-word Stroop interference: an ERP study.
Gootjes L; Coppens LC; Zwaan RA; Franken IH; Van Strien JW
Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Mar; 79(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 21156188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A controlled approach to the emotional dilution of the Stroop effect.
Fackrell K; Edmondson-Jones M; Hall DA
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80141. PubMed ID: 24223219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Emotional Stroop Dilution: The boundary conditions of attentional capture by threat words.
Reynolds MG; Langerak RM
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():108-15. PubMed ID: 26093219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attentional capture by taboo words: A functional view of auditory distraction.
Röer JP; Körner U; Buchner A; Bell R
Emotion; 2017 Jun; 17(4):740-750. PubMed ID: 28080086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anxiety and speaking in people who stutter: an investigation using the emotional Stroop task.
Hennessey NW; Dourado E; Beilby JM
J Fluency Disord; 2014 Jun; 40():44-57. PubMed ID: 24929466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is the emotional memory effect sensitive to encoding instructions and the passage of time?
Broderick T; Pilotti M; Sena-Jaramillo A
Am J Psychol; 2014; 127(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 24720097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is the emotional Stroop task a special case of mood induction? Evidence from sustained effects of attention under emotion.
Ben-Haim MS; Mama Y; Icht M; Algom D
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):81-97. PubMed ID: 24043566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The automatic activation of emotion words measured using the emotional face-word Stroop task in late Chinese-English bilinguals.
Fan L; Xu Q; Wang X; Xu F; Yang Y; Lu Z
Cogn Emot; 2018 Mar; 32(2):315-324. PubMed ID: 28332423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The effect of taboo word on language processing].
Huszár T; Makra E; Hallgató E; Janacsek K; Németh D
Psychiatr Hung; 2010; 25(6):525-37. PubMed ID: 21300999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are precues effective in proactively controlling taboo interference during speech production?
White KK; Abrams L; Hsi LR; Watkins EC
Cogn Emot; 2018 Dec; 32(8):1625-1636. PubMed ID: 29411684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
