192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26197762)
1. Improvement in quality of life after robotic surgery results in patient satisfaction.
Arms RG; Sun CC; Burzawa JK; Fleming ND; Nick AM; Rallapalli V; Westin SN; Meyer LA; Ramirez PT; Soliman PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):727-30. PubMed ID: 26197762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective cohort study comparing quality of life and sexual health outcomes between women undergoing robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery for endometrial cancer.
Ferguson SE; Panzarella T; Lau S; Gien LT; Samouëlian V; Giede C; Steed H; Le T; Renkosinski B; Bernardini MQ
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 149(3):476-483. PubMed ID: 29681461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective quality of life outcomes following robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.
Abitbol J; Lau S; Ramanakumar AV; Press JZ; Drummond N; Rosberger Z; Aubin S; Gotlieb R; How J; Gotlieb WH
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jul; 134(1):144-9. PubMed ID: 24796633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective comparison of postoperative pain and quality of life in robotic assisted vs conventional laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.
Zechmeister JR; Pua TL; Boyd LR; Blank SV; Curtin JP; Pothuri B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):194.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25108142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The health-related quality of life journey of gynecologic oncology surgical patients: Implications for the incorporation of patient-reported outcomes into surgical quality metrics.
Doll KM; Barber EL; Bensen JT; Snavely AC; Gehrig PA
Gynecol Oncol; 2016 May; 141(2):329-335. PubMed ID: 26957479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of surgical complications on health-related quality of life in women undergoing gynecologic and gynecologic oncology procedures: a prospective longitudinal cohort study.
Doll KM; Barber EL; Bensen JT; Revilla MC; Snavely AC; Bennett AV; Reeve BB; Gehrig PA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):457.e1-457.e13. PubMed ID: 27131589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes in gynecologic cancer patients before and after pelvic exenteration.
Armbruster SD; Sun CC; Westin SN; Bodurka DC; Ramondetta L; Meyer LA; Soliman PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 149(3):484-490. PubMed ID: 29622276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robot-assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Cancers.
Zanagnolo V; Garbi A; Achilarre MT; Minig L
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):379-396. PubMed ID: 28104497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecological Oncology.
Bush SH; Apte SM
Cancer Control; 2015 Jul; 22(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 26351886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The physical consequences of gynecologic cancer surgery and their impact on sexual, emotional, and quality of life issues.
Carter J; Stabile C; Gunn A; Sonoda Y
J Sex Med; 2013 Feb; 10 Suppl 1():21-34. PubMed ID: 23387909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-site robotic surgery in gynecologic cancer: a pilot study.
Yoo HN; Kim TJ; Lee YY; Choi CH; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 25609162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.
Fleming ND; Ramirez PT
Curr Opin Oncol; 2012 Sep; 24(5):547-53. PubMed ID: 22581356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Health-related quality of life after robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer--A prospective cohort study.
Herling SF; Møller AM; Palle C; Thomsen T
Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jan; 140(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 26541978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. One-year functional and anatomic outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal extraperitoneal colpopexy with mesh.
Jambusaria LH; Murphy M; Lucente VR
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 25185594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An analysis of operating time over the years for robotic-assisted surgery in gynecology and gynecologic oncology.
Rajanbabu A; Patel V; Anandita A; Burde K; Appukuttan A
J Robot Surg; 2021 Apr; 15(2):215-219. PubMed ID: 32452011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Learning Needs of Women Who Undergo Robotic Versus Open Gynecologic Surgery.
Kurt G; Loerzel VW; Hines RB; Tavasci K; Galura S; Ahmad S; Holloway RW
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2018 Jul; 47(4):490-497. PubMed ID: 29750905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic Heller myotomy: a safe operation with higher postoperative quality-of-life indices.
Huffmanm LC; Pandalai PK; Boulton BJ; James L; Starnes SL; Reed MF; Howington JA; Nussbaum MS
Surgery; 2007 Oct; 142(4):613-8; discussion 618-20. PubMed ID: 17950356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. EVAN-G score in patients undergoing minimally invasive gynecology oncologic surgery in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program.
Ferraioli D; Pouliquen C; Jauffret C; Charavil A; Blache G; Faucher M; Houvenaeghel G; El Hajj H; Lambaudie E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1966-1974. PubMed ID: 32546640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
