These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26198063)

  • 1. Which do you prefer, OCT or IVUS?
    Tobis J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):236. PubMed ID: 26198063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study.
    Magnus PC; Jayne JE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Swart M; van Es GA; Tijssen J; Kaplan AV
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
    Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Fujino Y; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Wang W; Yamamoto H; Chamié D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Tahara S; Nakamura S; Costa MA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.
    Ali ZA; Maehara A; Généreux P; Shlofmitz RA; Fabbiocchi F; Nazif TM; Guagliumi G; Meraj PM; Alfonso F; Samady H; Akasaka T; Carlson EB; Leesar MA; Matsumura M; Ozan MO; Mintz GS; Ben-Yehuda O; Stone GW;
    Lancet; 2016 Nov; 388(10060):2618-2628. PubMed ID: 27806900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection.
    Jamil Z; Tearney G; Bruining N; Sihan K; van Soest G; Ligthart J; van Domburg R; Bouma B; Regar E
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 29(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22639296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of longitudinal geometric measurement in human coronary arteries between frequency-domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.
    Liu Y; Shimamura K; Kubo T; Tanaka A; Kitabata H; Ino Y; Tanimoto T; Shiono Y; Orii M; Yamano T; Yamaguchi T; Hirata K; Imanishi T; Akasaka T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Feb; 30(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 24272334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Sirbu V; Musumeci G; Lortkipanidze N; Fujino Y; Wang W; Nakamura S; Erglis A; Guagliumi G; Costa MA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar; 6(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 23517833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variability in quantitative and qualitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound and frequency domain optical coherence tomography.
    Abnousi F; Waseda K; Kume T; Otake H; Kawarada O; Yong CM; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y; Yeung AC; Fearon WF
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E192-9. PubMed ID: 23412754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Practical Approach to Assessing Stent Results with IVUS or OCT.
    Hachinohe D; Mitomo S; Candilio L; Latib A
    Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2018; 14(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 29623170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vivo comparison of lumen dimensions measured by time domain-, and frequency domain-optical coherence tomography, and intravascular ultrasound.
    Kim SJ; Lee H; Kato K; Yonetsu T; Jang IK
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jun; 29(5):967-75. PubMed ID: 23292151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multi-modality imaging for stent edge assessment.
    Ann SH; Lim KH; De Jin C; Shin ES
    Heart Vessels; 2015 Mar; 30(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 24481539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in detecting neointimal healing patterns after stent implantation.
    Kochman J; Pietrasik A; Rdzanak A; Jąkała J; Zasada W; Scibisz A; Kołtowski L; Proniewska K; Pociask E; Legutko J
    Kardiol Pol; 2014; 72(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 24293141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Role of Vascular Imaging in Guiding Routine Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Bare Metal Stent and Drug-Eluting Stent Trials.
    Alsidawi S; Effat M; Rahman S; Abdallah M; Leesar M
    Cardiovasc Ther; 2015 Dec; 33(6):360-6. PubMed ID: 26363283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intra-stent tissue evaluation within bare metal and drug-eluting stents > 3 years since implantation in patients with mild to moderate neointimal proliferation using optical coherence tomography and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound.
    Kitabata H; Loh JP; Pendyala LK; Omar A; Ota H; Minha S; Magalhaes MA; Torguson R; Chen F; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Apr; 15(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 24767313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. OCT-measured plaque free wall angle is indicative for plaque burden: overcoming the main limitation of OCT?
    Hoogendoorn A; Gnanadesigan M; Zahnd G; van Ditzhuijzen NS; Schuurbiers JC; van Soest G; Regar E; Wentzel JJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Oct; 32(10):1477-81. PubMed ID: 27437923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study.
    Kubo T; Akasaka T; Shite J; Suzuki T; Uemura S; Yu B; Kozuma K; Kitabata H; Shinke T; Habara M; Saito Y; Hou J; Suzuki N; Zhang S
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multimodality imaging of attenuated plaque using grayscale and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and optical coherent tomography.
    Kang SJ; Ahn JM; Han S; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Mintz GS; Park SJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 88(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 25511369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optical coherence tomography visualization of stent deformation with subsequent thrombus adhesion at very early phase after everolimus-eluting stent implantation: a case report.
    Yamamura S; Fujisue K; Tsujita K; Sakamoto K; Miyazaki Y; Kaikita K; Hokimoto S; Ogawa H
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 May; 16():116. PubMed ID: 27245071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intravascular imaging comparison of two metallic limus-eluting stents abluminally coated with biodegradable polymers: IVUS and OCT results of the DESTINY trial.
    Costa JR; Chamié D; Abizaid AA; Ribeiro E; Meireles GC; Prudente M; Campos CA; Castro JP; Costa R; Lemos PA
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):161-168. PubMed ID: 27714601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.