232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26198374)
1. Experiences with obtaining informed consent for genomic sequencing.
Bernhardt BA; Roche MI; Perry DL; Scollon SR; Tomlinson AN; Skinner D
Am J Med Genet A; 2015 Nov; 167A(11):2635-46. PubMed ID: 26198374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. "Not Tied Up Neatly with a Bow": Professionals' Challenging Cases in Informed Consent for Genomic Sequencing.
Tomlinson AN; Skinner D; Perry DL; Scollon SR; Roche MI; Bernhardt BA
J Genet Couns; 2016 Feb; 25(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 25911622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Old Challenges or New Issues? Genetic Health Professionals' Experiences Obtaining Informed Consent in Diagnostic Genomic Sequencing.
Vears DF; Borry P; Savulescu J; Koplin JJ
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2021; 12(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 33017265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Challenges to informed consent for exome sequencing: A best-worst scaling experiment.
Gore RH; Bridges JFP; Cohen JS; Biesecker BB
J Genet Couns; 2019 Dec; 28(6):1189-1197. PubMed ID: 31553105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical providers' experiences with returning results from genomic sequencing: an interview study.
Wynn J; Lewis K; Amendola LM; Bernhardt BA; Biswas S; Joshi M; McMullen C; Scollon S
BMC Med Genomics; 2018 May; 11(1):45. PubMed ID: 29739461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Informed consent practices for exome sequencing: An interview study with clinical geneticists in the Netherlands.
Bos W; Bunnik EM
Mol Genet Genomic Med; 2022 Mar; 10(3):e1882. PubMed ID: 35150093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed consent for exome sequencing research in families with genetic disease: the emerging issue of incidental findings.
Bergner AL; Bollinger J; Raraigh KS; Tichnell C; Murray B; Blout CL; Telegrafi AB; James CA
Am J Med Genet A; 2014 Nov; 164A(11):2745-52. PubMed ID: 25251809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Content Analysis of Informed Consent for Whole Genome Sequencing Offered by Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Companies.
Niemiec E; Borry P; Pinxten W; Howard HC
Hum Mutat; 2016 Dec; 37(12):1248-1256. PubMed ID: 27647801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stakeholders' opinions on the implementation of pediatric whole exome sequencing: implications for informed consent.
Levenseller BL; Soucier DJ; Miller VA; Harris D; Conway L; Bernhardt BA
J Genet Couns; 2014 Aug; 23(4):552-65. PubMed ID: 23846343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consent for clinical genome sequencing: considerations from the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.
Yu JH; Appelbaum PS; Brothers KB; Joffe S; Kauffman TL; Koenig BA; Prince AE; Scollon S; Wolf SM; Bernhardt BA; Wilfond BS;
Per Med; 2019 Jul; 16(4):325-333. PubMed ID: 31313633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Overcoming challenges to meaningful informed consent for whole genome sequencing in pediatric cancer research.
Oberg JA; Glade Bender JL; Cohn EG; Morris M; Ruiz J; Chung WK; Appelbaum PS; Kung AL; Levine JM
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2015 Aug; 62(8):1374-80. PubMed ID: 25832998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical and legal implications of whole genome and whole exome sequencing in African populations.
Wright GE; Koornhof PG; Adeyemo AA; Tiffin N
BMC Med Ethics; 2013 May; 14():21. PubMed ID: 23714101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Understanding variations in secondary findings reporting practices across U.S. genome sequencing laboratories.
Ackerman SL; Koenig BA
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 29131714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed Consent in Two Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers: Insights From Research Coordinators.
Suver CM; Hamann JK; Chin EM; Goldstein FC; Blazel HM; Manzanares CM; Doerr MJ; Asthana SJ; Mangravite LM; Levey AI; Lah JJ; Edwards DF
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2020; 11(2):114-124. PubMed ID: 32175821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed Consent in the Genomics Era.
Rego S; Grove ME; Cho MK; Ormond KE
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2020 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 31570382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Social Annotation Valence: The Impact on Online Informed Consent Beliefs and Behavior.
Balestra M; Shaer O; Okerlund J; Westendorf L; Ball M; Nov O
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Jul; 18(7):e197. PubMed ID: 27439320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Models of consent to return of incidental findings in genomic research.
Appelbaum PS; Parens E; Waldman CR; Klitzman R; Fyer A; Martinez J; Price WN; Chung WK
Hastings Cent Rep; 2014; 44(4):22-32. PubMed ID: 24919982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physician-Investigator, Research Coordinator, and Patient Perspectives on Dual-Role Consent in Oncology: A Qualitative Study.
Morain SR; Barlevy D; Joffe S; Largent EA
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2325477. PubMed ID: 37490290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Guardians and research staff experiences and views about the consent process in hospital-based paediatric research studies in urban Malawi: A qualitative study.
Gondwe MJ; Toto NM; Gunda C; Gmeiner M; MacCormick IJC; Lalloo D; Parker M; Desmond N
BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Dec; 23(1):125. PubMed ID: 36471294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Understandings of genomic research in developing countries: a qualitative study of the views of MalariaGEN participants in Mali.
Traore K; Bull S; Niare A; Konate S; Thera MA; Kwiatkowski D; Parker M; Doumbo OK
BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Jun; 16():42. PubMed ID: 26077875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
