131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26198598)
1. An improved model of predicting hepatocarcinogenic potential in rats by using gene expression data.
Yamada F; Sumida K; Saito K
J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Feb; 36(2):296-308. PubMed ID: 26198598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Toxicogenomics discrimination of potential hepatocarcinogenicity of non-genotoxic compounds in rat liver.
Yamada F; Sumida K; Uehara T; Morikawa Y; Yamada H; Urushidani T; Ohno Y
J Appl Toxicol; 2013 Nov; 33(11):1284-93. PubMed ID: 22806939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction model of potential hepatocarcinogenicity of rat hepatocarcinogens using a large-scale toxicogenomics database.
Uehara T; Minowa Y; Morikawa Y; Kondo C; Maruyama T; Kato I; Nakatsu N; Igarashi Y; Ono A; Hayashi H; Mitsumori K; Yamada H; Ohno Y; Urushidani T
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2011 Sep; 255(3):297-306. PubMed ID: 21784091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of a carcinogenic potential of rat hepatocarcinogens using toxicogenomics analysis of short-term in vivo studies.
Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Gmuender H; Bandenburg A; Ahr HJ
Mutat Res; 2008 Jan; 637(1-2):23-39. PubMed ID: 17689568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A toxicogenomics approach for early assessment of potential non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogenicity of chemicals in rats.
Uehara T; Hirode M; Ono A; Kiyosawa N; Omura K; Shimizu T; Mizukawa Y; Miyagishima T; Nagao T; Urushidani T
Toxicology; 2008 Aug; 250(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 18619722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of hepatocarcinogen-induced gene expression profiles in conventional primary rat hepatocytes with in vivo rat liver.
Doktorova TY; Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Vinken M; Vanhaecke T; van Delft J; Kleinjans J; Ahr HJ; Rogiers V
Arch Toxicol; 2012 Sep; 86(9):1399-411. PubMed ID: 22484513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens and prediction of their mechanism of action in rats using gene marker sets.
Kanki M; Gi M; Fujioka M; Wanibuchi H
J Toxicol Sci; 2016 Apr; 41(2):281-92. PubMed ID: 26961613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of 12 mouse marker genes in rat toxicogenomics public data, Open TG-GATEs: Discrimination of genotoxic from non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens.
Furihata C; Suzuki T
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2019 Feb; 838():9-15. PubMed ID: 30678831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CARCINOscreen®: New short-term prediction method for hepatocarcinogenicity of chemicals based on hepatic transcript profiling in rats.
Matsumoto H; Saito F; Takeyoshi M
J Toxicol Sci; 2014; 39(5):725-34. PubMed ID: 25242402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the expression profiles induced by genotoxic and nongenotoxic carcinogens in rat liver.
Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Stuart B; Wahle B; Bomann W; Ahr HJ
Mutat Res; 2005 Aug; 575(1-2):61-84. PubMed ID: 15890375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of specific mRNA signatures as fingerprints for carcinogenesis in mice induced by genotoxic and nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogens.
Kossler N; Matheis KA; Ostenfeldt N; Bach Toft D; Dhalluin S; Deschl U; Kalkuhl A
Toxicol Sci; 2015 Feb; 143(2):277-95. PubMed ID: 25410580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A toxicogenomic approach for the prediction of murine hepatocarcinogenesis using ensemble feature selection.
Eichner J; Kossler N; Wrzodek C; Kalkuhl A; Bach Toft D; Ostenfeldt N; Richard V; Zell A
PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e73938. PubMed ID: 24040119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing compound carcinogenicity in vitro using connectivity mapping.
Caiment F; Tsamou M; Jennen D; Kleinjans J
Carcinogenesis; 2014 Jan; 35(1):201-7. PubMed ID: 23940306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting the hepatocarcinogenic potential of alkenylbenzene flavoring agents using toxicogenomics and machine learning.
Auerbach SS; Shah RR; Mav D; Smith CS; Walker NJ; Vallant MK; Boorman GA; Irwin RD
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 243(3):300-14. PubMed ID: 20004213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative analysis of predictive models for nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogenicity using both toxicogenomics and quantitative structure-activity relationships.
Liu Z; Kelly R; Fang H; Ding D; Tong W
Chem Res Toxicol; 2011 Jul; 24(7):1062-70. PubMed ID: 21627106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cross-platform toxicogenomics for the prediction of non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogenesis in rat.
Römer M; Eichner J; Metzger U; Templin MF; Plummer S; Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Zell A
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e97640. PubMed ID: 24830643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Carcinogenome Project: In Vitro Gene Expression Profiling of Chemical Perturbations to Predict Long-Term Carcinogenicity.
Li A; Lu X; Natoli T; Bittker J; Sipes NS; Subramanian A; Auerbach S; Sherr DH; Monti S
Environ Health Perspect; 2019 Apr; 127(4):47002. PubMed ID: 30964323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive toxicogenomics approaches reveal underlying molecular mechanisms of nongenotoxic carcinogenicity.
Nie AY; McMillian M; Parker JB; Leone A; Bryant S; Yieh L; Bittner A; Nelson J; Carmen A; Wan J; Lord PG
Mol Carcinog; 2006 Dec; 45(12):914-33. PubMed ID: 16921489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic models of short-term exposure accurately predict long-term chemical carcinogenicity and identify putative mechanisms of action.
Gusenleitner D; Auerbach SS; Melia T; Gómez HF; Sherr DH; Monti S
PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e102579. PubMed ID: 25058030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterizing and predicting carcinogenicity and mode of action using conventional and toxicogenomics methods.
Waters MD; Jackson M; Lea I
Mutat Res; 2010 Dec; 705(3):184-200. PubMed ID: 20399889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
