131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26198598)
41. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins.
Kirkland D; Reeve L; Gatehouse D; Vanparys P
Mutat Res; 2011 Mar; 721(1):27-73. PubMed ID: 21238603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. In vivo murine hepatic microRNA and mRNA expression signatures predicting the (non-)genotoxic carcinogenic potential of chemicals.
Melis JP; Derks KW; Pronk TE; Wackers P; Schaap MM; Zwart E; van Ijcken WF; Jonker MJ; Breit TM; Pothof J; van Steeg H; Luijten M
Arch Toxicol; 2014 Apr; 88(4):1023-34. PubMed ID: 24390151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Discrimination of genotoxic and non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens by statistical analysis based on gene expression profiling in the mouse liver as determined by quantitative real-time PCR.
Watanabe T; Suzuki T; Natsume M; Nakajima M; Narumi K; Hamada S; Sakuma T; Koeda A; Oshida K; Miyamoto Y; Maeda A; Hirayama M; Sanada H; Honda H; Ohyama W; Okada E; Fujiishi Y; Sutou S; Tadakuma A; Ishikawa Y; Kido M; Minamiguchi R; Hanahara I; Furihata C
Mutat Res; 2012 Sep; 747(2):164-75. PubMed ID: 22634710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Literature-based compound profiling: application to toxicogenomics.
Frijters R; Verhoeven S; Alkema W; van Schaik R; Polman J
Pharmacogenomics; 2007 Nov; 8(11):1521-34. PubMed ID: 18034617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Inter-laboratory study of human in vitro toxicogenomics-based tests as alternative methods for evaluating chemical carcinogenicity: a bioinformatics perspective.
Herwig R; Gmuender H; Corvi R; Bloch KM; Brandenburg A; Castell J; Ceelen L; Chesne C; Doktorova TY; Jennen D; Jennings P; Limonciel A; Lock EA; McMorrow T; Phrakonkham P; Radford R; Slattery C; Stierum R; Vilardell M; Wittenberger T; Yildirimman R; Ryan M; Rogiers V; Kleinjans J
Arch Toxicol; 2016 Sep; 90(9):2215-2229. PubMed ID: 26525393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cell transformation assay: review of the methods and results.
Mauthe RJ; Gibson DP; Bunch RT; Custer L
Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():138-46. PubMed ID: 11695550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Opportunities for an alternative integrating testing strategy for carcinogen hazard assessment?
Doktorova TY; Pauwels M; Vinken M; Vanhaecke T; Rogiers V
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2012 Feb; 42(2):91-106. PubMed ID: 22141324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. In vivo Comet assay on isolated kidney cells to distinguish genotoxic carcinogens from epigenetic carcinogens or cytotoxic compounds.
Nesslany F; Zennouche N; Simar-Meintières S; Talahari I; Nkili-Mboui EN; Marzin D
Mutat Res; 2007 Jun; 630(1-2):28-41. PubMed ID: 17507283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A feasibility study: Can information collected to classify for mutagenicity be informative in predicting carcinogenicity?
Petkov PI; Patlewicz G; Schultz TW; Honma M; Todorov M; Kotov S; Dimitrov SD; Donner EM; Mekenyan OG
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Jun; 72(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 25792138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Simpler alternative to CARCINOscreen(®) based on quantitative PCR (qPCR).
Saito F; Matsumoto H; Akahori Y; Takeyoshi M
J Toxicol Sci; 2016; 41(3):383-90. PubMed ID: 27193730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Prediction of non-genotoxic carcinogenesis in rats using changes in gene expression following acute dosing.
Nioi P; Pardo ID; Sherratt PJ; Snyder RD
Chem Biol Interact; 2008 Apr; 172(3):206-15. PubMed ID: 18328469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Optimization of an animal test protocol for toxicogenomics studies (I); requirement study of a protocol.
Sumida K; Saito K; Oeda K; Otsuka M; Tsujimura K; Miyaura H; Sekijima M; Nakayama K; Kawano Y; Kawakami Y; Asamoto M; Shirai T
J Toxicol Sci; 2007 Feb; 32(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 17327691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Liver tumor promoters and other mouse liver carcinogens.
Ward JM; Diwan BA; Lubet RA; Henneman JR; Devor DE
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 331():85-108. PubMed ID: 2179967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Investigation of the early-response genes in chemical-induced renal carcinogenicity for the prediction of chemical carcinogenicity in rats.
Matsumoto H; Saito F; Takeyoshi M
J Toxicol Sci; 2017; 42(2):175-181. PubMed ID: 28321044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Diethylnitrosamine initiation does not alter clofibric acid-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in the rat.
Michel C; Desdouets C; Slaoui M; Isaacs KR; Roberts RA; Boitier E
Toxicol Sci; 2007 Sep; 99(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 17602206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Assessment of global and gene-specific DNA methylation in rat liver and kidney in response to non-genotoxic carcinogen exposure.
Ozden S; Turgut Kara N; Sezerman OU; Durasi İM; Chen T; Demirel G; Alpertunga B; Chipman JK; Mally A
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2015 Dec; 289(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 26431795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Short-term tests for defining mutagenic carcinogens.
Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA
IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):499-536. PubMed ID: 10353401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A Bhas 42 cell transformation assay on 98 chemicals: the characteristics and performance for the prediction of chemical carcinogenicity.
Sakai A; Sasaki K; Muramatsu D; Arai S; Endou N; Kuroda S; Hayashi K; Lim YM; Yamazaki S; Umeda M; Tanaka N
Mutat Res; 2010 Sep; 702(1):100-22. PubMed ID: 20656056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Novel naïve Bayes classification models for predicting the carcinogenicity of chemicals.
Zhang H; Cao ZX; Li M; Li YZ; Peng C
Food Chem Toxicol; 2016 Nov; 97():141-149. PubMed ID: 27597133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Optimization of an animal test protocol for toxicogenomics studies (ii); a cross-laboratory gene expression analysis.
Sumida K; Saito K; Oeda K; Otsuka M; Tsujimura K; Miyaura H; Sekijima M; Nakayama K; Kawano Y; Kawakami Y; Asamoto M; Shirai T
J Toxicol Sci; 2007 Feb; 32(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 17327692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
