These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26199432)

  • 1. Copper Filtration and kVp: Effect on Entrance Skin Exposure.
    Barba J; Culp M
    Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(6):603-9. PubMed ID: 26199432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High kilovoltage digital exposure techniques and patient dosimetry.
    Fauber TL; Cohen TF; Dempsey MC
    Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(6):501-10. PubMed ID: 21771934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing Contrast Resolution in Digital Chest Radiography by Varying Copper Filtration and kVp.
    Balac V; Grossman R; Griswold R; Bowman D
    Radiol Technol; 2023 Nov; 95(2):94-104. PubMed ID: 37940170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing 10 kVp and 15% Rules in Extremity Radiography.
    Coffey H; Chanopensiri V; Ly B; Nguyen D
    Radiol Technol; 2020 Jul; 91(6):516-524. PubMed ID: 32606229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Copper filtration in pediatric digital X-ray imaging: its impact on image quality and dose.
    Brosi P; Stuessi A; Verdun FR; Vock P; Wolf R
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2011 Jul; 4(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 21431385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
    Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DigiBit: A System for Adjusting Radiographic Exposure Factors in the Digital Era.
    Ching W; Robinson J; McEntee MF
    Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 26199434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
    Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated low-kilovoltage selection in pediatric computed tomography angiography: phantom study evaluating effects on radiation dose and image quality.
    Siegel MJ; Ramirez-Giraldo JC; Hildebolt C; Bradley D; Schmidt B
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):584-9. PubMed ID: 23563195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of added filtration on radiation dose and image quality in digital radiography of newborns.
    Papadakis AE; Giannakaki V; Hatzidaki E; Damilakis J
    Pediatr Radiol; 2023 Sep; 53(10):2060-2068. PubMed ID: 37310445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration?
    Tugwell-Allsup JR; Morris RW; Thomas K; Hibbs R; England A
    Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20211026. PubMed ID: 34797726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A pilot study investigating two dose reduction techniques for AP lumbar spine radiography using direct dosimetry and Projection VR.
    Shanahan MC
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):222-228. PubMed ID: 28687290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of kilovoltage, milliampere seconds, and focal spot size on image quality.
    Kei Ma W; Hogg P; Norton S
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(5):479-85. PubMed ID: 24806050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of AEC chamber selection on patient dose and image quality.
    Hawking N; Elmore A
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(5):411-9. PubMed ID: 19457845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of acquisition parameters on dose and image quality optimisation in paediatric pelvis radiography-A phantom study.
    Mohammed Ali A; Hogg P; Abuzaid M; England A
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():130-137. PubMed ID: 31439232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image-quality perception as a function of dose in digital radiography.
    Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Korkusuz H; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Mack MG; Vogl TJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):1399-403. PubMed ID: 22109295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Post-processing image filtration enabling dose reduction in standard abdominal CT.
    Leander P; Söderberg M; Fält T; Gunnarsson M; Albertsson I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):180-5. PubMed ID: 20207748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners.
    Ay MR; Mehranian A; Maleki A; Ghadiri H; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H
    Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 22541061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.