104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26199434)
1. DigiBit: A System for Adjusting Radiographic Exposure Factors in the Digital Era.
Ching W; Robinson J; McEntee MF
Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 26199434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High kilovoltage digital exposure techniques and patient dosimetry.
Fauber TL; Cohen TF; Dempsey MC
Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(6):501-10. PubMed ID: 21771934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Copper Filtration and kVp: Effect on Entrance Skin Exposure.
Barba J; Culp M
Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(6):603-9. PubMed ID: 26199432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
Busch HP; Faulkner K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of kilovoltage, milliampere seconds, and focal spot size on image quality.
Kei Ma W; Hogg P; Norton S
Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(5):479-85. PubMed ID: 24806050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of AEC chamber selection on patient dose and image quality.
Hawking N; Elmore A
Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(5):411-9. PubMed ID: 19457845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital radiography: optimization of image quality and dose using multi-frequency software.
Precht H; Gerke O; Rosendahl K; Tingberg A; Waaler D
Pediatr Radiol; 2012 Sep; 42(9):1112-8. PubMed ID: 22526280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital radiography: are the manufacturers' settings too high? Optimisation of the Kodak digital radiography system with aid of the computed radiography dose index.
Peters SE; Brennan PC
Eur Radiol; 2002 Sep; 12(9):2381-7. PubMed ID: 12195499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimizing the Exposure Indicator as a Dose Management Strategy in Computed Radiography.
Seeram E; Davidson R; Bushong S; Swan H
Radiol Technol; 2016; 87(4):380-91. PubMed ID: 26952062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Reduction of patient exposure by the use of digital luminescence radiography].
Seifert H; Chapot C
J Radiol; 1999 Nov; 80(11):1555-60. PubMed ID: 10592912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Chest tomosynthesis].
Shibata K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1486-91. PubMed ID: 22104244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing 10 kVp and 15% Rules in Extremity Radiography.
Coffey H; Chanopensiri V; Ly B; Nguyen D
Radiol Technol; 2020 Jul; 91(6):516-524. PubMed ID: 32606229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image gently campaign back to basics initiative: ten steps to help manage radiation dose in pediatric digital radiography.
Don S; Macdougall R; Strauss K; Moore QT; Goske MJ; Cohen M; Herrmann T; John SD; Noble L; Morrison G; Lehman L; Whiting BR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):W431-6. PubMed ID: 23617510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose optimization for different medical imaging tasks from exposure index, exposure control factor, and MAS in digital radiography.
Zhang M; Zhao B; Wang Y; Chen W; Hou L
Health Phys; 2012 Sep; 103(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 22850227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated low-kilovoltage selection in pediatric computed tomography angiography: phantom study evaluating effects on radiation dose and image quality.
Siegel MJ; Ramirez-Giraldo JC; Hildebolt C; Bradley D; Schmidt B
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):584-9. PubMed ID: 23563195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of urinary stones at reduced radiation exposure: a phantom study comparing computed radiography and a low-dose digital radiography linear slit scanning system.
Szucs-Farkas Z; Chakraborty DP; Thoeny HC; Loupatatzis C; Vock P; Bonel HM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):W271-4. PubMed ID: 19457787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
