These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26199495)

  • 1. A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Compression Resistance of Different Interocclusal Recording Materials: An In Vitro Study.
    Nagrath R; Lahori M; Kumar V; Gupta V
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2014 Dec; 14(Suppl 1):76-85. PubMed ID: 26199495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of three types of interocclusal recording materials-an in-vitro multi-centre study.
    Tejo SK; Kumar AG; Kattimani VS; Desai PD; Nalla S; Chaitanya K K
    Head Face Med; 2012 Oct; 8():27. PubMed ID: 23039395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation and comparison of resistance to compression of various interocclusal recording media: an in vitro study.
    Chandu GS; Khan MF; Mishra SK; Asnani P
    J Int Oral Health; 2015 May; 7(5):24-9. PubMed ID: 26028898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Four Elastomeric Interocclusal Recording Materials.
    Dua P; Gupta SH; Ramachandran S; Sandhu HS
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2007 Jul; 63(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 27408006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compressive strength of interocclusal recording materials.
    Keyf F; Altunsoy S
    Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 11210251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative evaluation of three dimensional accuracy of different types of interocclusal recording materials - an
    Dwivedi A; Maru K; Sharma A
    Med Pharm Rep; 2020 Jul; 93(3):280-286. PubMed ID: 32832893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compression resistance of four interocclusal recording materials.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Dec; 68(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 1494111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of dimensional stability, compressive resistance, and detail reproduction of thermoplastic resin (
    Koppolu SK; Manoharan PS; Rajkumar E; Ezhumalai G
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 36588377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An In Vitro Study of Condylar Displacement Caused by Interocclusal Records: Influence of Recording Material, Storage Time, and Recording Technique.
    Ghazal M; Hedderich J; Kern M
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):587-593. PubMed ID: 26833815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiographic Appearance of Interocclusal Record Materials for Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Implant Surgeries.
    Mohunta VV; McGlumphy EA; Kim DG; Azer SS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(3):489-495. PubMed ID: 28494032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of disinfectants by immersion and spray atomization techniques on the linear dimensional stability of different interocclusal recording materials: An in vitro study.
    Gounder R; Vikas BVJ
    Eur J Dent; 2016; 10(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 27011733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polymerization shrinkage strain of interocclusal recording materials.
    Chun JH; Pae A; Kim SH
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 18614226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trends in Selection, Usage, and Techniques of Interocclusal Record Materials among Private Dental Practitioners: A Survey.
    Maru K; Dwivedi A; Agarwal J; Vyas A; Jain S; Kulkarni P
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2018 Jun; 9(Suppl 1):S127-S132. PubMed ID: 29962777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part III: resistance to compression after setting.
    Michalakis KX; Pissiotis A; Anastasiadou V; Kapari D
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 15610544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does the available interocclusal space influence the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an intraoral scanner?
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Zeitler JM; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Pérez-Barquero JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug; 132(2):435-440. PubMed ID: 36349566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study to evaluate the accuracy of polyether occlusal bite registration material and occlusal registration wax as a guide for occlusal reduction during tooth preparation.
    Joshi N; Shetty SN; Prasad KD
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(6):730-5. PubMed ID: 24552935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal records in relation to two recording techniques.
    Tripodakis AP; Vergos VK; Tsoutsos AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Feb; 77(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 9051601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of three interocclusal recording materials used to mount a working cast.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL; Kinderknecht KE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Mar; 71(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 8164168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compressibility of two polyvinyl siloxane interocclusal record materials and its effect on mounted cast relationships.
    Campos AA; Nathanson D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Oct; 82(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 10512966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The ability of different materials to reproduce accurate records of interocclusal relationships in the vertical dimension.
    Ghazal M; Albashaireh ZS; Kern M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):816-20. PubMed ID: 18482345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.