These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26199544)

  • 1. A Simple Technique to Fabricate a Facial Moulage with a Prefabricated Acrylic Stock Tray: A Clinical Innovation.
    Kusum CK; Indrajeet ; Wankhade BG
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2014 Dec; 14(Suppl 1):341-4. PubMed ID: 26199544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facial moulage fabrication using a two-stage poly (vinyl siloxane) impression.
    Alsiyabi AS; Minsley GE
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 16681502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simple technique for impression taking of teeth and functionally generated paths.
    Yamamoto T; Sato Y; Watanabe H; Punj A; Abe M; Momoi Y; Ohkubo C
    Restor Dent Endod; 2018 Feb; 43(1):e9. PubMed ID: 29487839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
    Saini HS; Jain S; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simplified technique for orbital prosthesis fabrication: a clinical report.
    Veerareddy C; Nair KC; Reddy GR
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):561-8. PubMed ID: 22672591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiotherapy molds: An approach to fabricating facial moulage.
    Gupta L; Kumar A; Gurav SV; Pandey D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):799-801. PubMed ID: 35369982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impression material thickness in stock and custom trays.
    Bomberg TJ; Hatch RA; Hoffman W
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Aug; 54(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 3903109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prefabricated stock trays for impression of auricular region.
    Vibha S; Anandkrishna GN; Anupam P; Namratha N
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2010 Jun; 10(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 21629455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Gordon GE; Johnson GH; Drennon DG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2404101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
    Rajapur A; Dixit S; Hoshing C; Raikar SP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Accuracy of Facial Models Fabricated Using Traditional and 3D Imaging Techniques.
    Lincoln KP; Sun AY; Prihoda TJ; Sutton AJ
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Apr; 25(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 26381058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.
    Menini M; Setti P; Pera F; Pera P; Pesce P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 28965251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of the Dies Affected by Tray Type, Material Viscosity, and Pouring Sequence of Dual and Single Arch Impressions- An In vitro Study.
    Kulkarni PR; Kulkarni RS; Shah RJ; Chhajlani R; Saklecha B; Maru K
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Apr; 11(4):ZC128-ZC135. PubMed ID: 28571280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A two-stage impression technique for custom facial prostheses.
    Coleman AJ; Schweiger JW; Urquiola J; Tompkins KA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Apr; 73(4):370-2. PubMed ID: 7783016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Universal Tray Adhesives on Silicone Impression Materials Using an Acrylic Tray.
    Kambiranda SC; Pinto B; Elpatal MA; Sam G; Chaitra AS; Rani RP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Dec; 20(12):1406-1411. PubMed ID: 32381841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of a separating foil impression using a novel polyolefin foil compared to a custom tray and a stock tray technique.
    Pastoret MH; Krastl G; Bühler J; Weiger R; Zitzmann NU
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Aug; 9(4):287-293. PubMed ID: 28874996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A custom impression tray made with the aid of an existing prosthesis: a clinical technique.
    Cain JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Oct; 86(4):382-5. PubMed ID: 11677532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A technique for making a facial moulage under general anesthesia.
    Taicher S; Sela M; Tubiana I; Peled I
    J Prosthet Dent; 1983 Nov; 50(5):677-80. PubMed ID: 6580436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.