These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26199749)

  • 1. A unified classification model for modeling of seismic liquefaction potential of soil based on CPT.
    Samui P; Hariharan R
    J Adv Res; 2015 Jul; 6(4):587-92. PubMed ID: 26199749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probabilistic evaluation of CPT-based seismic soil liquefaction potential: towards the integration of interpretive structural modeling and bayesian belief network.
    Ahmad M; Ahmad F; Huang J; Iqbal MJ; Safdar M; Pirhadi N
    Math Biosci Eng; 2021 Oct; 18(6):9233-9252. PubMed ID: 34814343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of the SPT-based seismic soil liquefaction triggering evaluation methodology in engineering hazard assessments.
    Cetin KO; Seed RB; Kayen RE; Moss RES; Bilge HT; Ilgac M; Chowdhury K
    MethodsX; 2018; 5():1556-1575. PubMed ID: 30568880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data on a coupled ENN / t-SNE model for soil liquefaction evaluation.
    Atangana Njock PG; Shen SL; Zhou A; Lyu HM
    Data Brief; 2020 Apr; 29():105125. PubMed ID: 32055655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of Feedforward Neural Network and SPT Results in the Estimation of Seismic Soil Liquefaction Triggering.
    Pham TA
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2021; 2021():1058825. PubMed ID: 34707648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Datasets for gravelly soil liquefaction case histories.
    Hu J; Wang J; Zou W; Yang B
    Data Brief; 2021 Jun; 36():107104. PubMed ID: 34036129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adjustment of a numerical model for pore pressure generation during an earthquake.
    Garcia Diez JL; Gonzalez Galindo J; Soriano Peña A;
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222834. PubMed ID: 31557203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ground response analysis and liquefaction for Kalyani region, Kolkata.
    Kumar S; Muley P; Madani SN
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Sep; 30(44):99127-99146. PubMed ID: 36269476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dataset on SPT-based seismic soil liquefaction.
    Cetin KO; Seed RB; Kayen RE; Moss RES; Bilge HT; Ilgac M; Chowdhury K
    Data Brief; 2018 Oct; 20():544-548. PubMed ID: 30191167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Stacked Generalization Model to Enhance Prediction of Earthquake-Induced Soil Liquefaction.
    Preethaa S; Natarajan Y; Rathinakumar AP; Lee DE; Choi Y; Park YJ; Yi CY
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Study on sand liquefaction induced by Songyuan earthquake with a magnitude of M5.7 in China.
    Li P; Tian Z; Bo J; Zhu S; Li Y
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):9588. PubMed ID: 35688910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Datasets for liquefaction case studies of gravelly soils during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake.
    Zhou YG; Xia P; Ling DS; Chen YM
    Data Brief; 2020 Oct; 32():106308. PubMed ID: 33015255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Earthquake Probability Assessment for the Indian Subcontinent Using Deep Learning.
    Jena R; Pradhan B; Al-Amri A; Lee CW; Park HJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Aug; 20(16):. PubMed ID: 32764354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The correction factor of Monterey No. 0/30 sample with fines content liquefaction resistance between cyclic triaxial and cyclic hollow cylinder tests.
    Liu J; Chen G
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15927. PubMed ID: 36151234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vertical ground motion and its effects on liquefaction resistance of fully saturated sand deposits.
    Tsaparli V; Kontoe S; Taborda DM; Potts DM
    Proc Math Phys Eng Sci; 2016 Aug; 472(2192):20160434. PubMed ID: 27616931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cone penetration test dataset Premstaller Geotechnik.
    Oberhollenzer S; Premstaller M; Marte R; Tschuchnigg F; Erharter GH; Marcher T
    Data Brief; 2021 Feb; 34():106618. PubMed ID: 33354601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting seismic-induced liquefaction through ensemble learning frameworks.
    Alobaidi MH; Meguid MA; Chebana F
    Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11786. PubMed ID: 31409827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sinking during earthquakes: Critical acceleration criteria control drained soil liquefaction.
    Clément C; Toussaint R; Stojanova M; Aharonov E
    Phys Rev E; 2018 Feb; 97(2-1):022905. PubMed ID: 29548244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structural Minimax Probability Machine.
    Gu B; Sun X; Sheng VS
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2017 Jul; 28(7):1646-1656. PubMed ID: 27101618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A potential microbiological approach to the evaluation of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction.
    Chao YT; Lai SH; Chang MH; Chen CC; Lee WF; Chen JW; Hsu YC
    iScience; 2021 Sep; 24(9):102984. PubMed ID: 34485866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.