These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26200153)
1. Passivity of conventional and CAD/CAM fabricated implant frameworks. de Araújo GM; de França DG; Silva Neto JP; Barbosa GA Braz Dent J; 2015; 26(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 26200153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses. de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Barbosa GA J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Precision Fit of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses Fabricated by CAD/CAM, Copy-Milling, and Conventional Methods. de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Carreiro AF; Barbosa GA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(3):507–513. PubMed ID: 27706265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks. Presotto AG; Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Barão VA J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 27666497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Vertical Misfit of CAD/CAM Implant-Supported Titanium and Zirconia Frameworks. da Cunha Fontoura D; de Magalhães Barros V; de Magalhães CS; Vaz RR; Moreira AN Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1027-1032. PubMed ID: 30231088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses. Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Precision of fit of implant-supported screw-retained 10-unit computer-aided-designed and computer-aided-manufactured frameworks made from zirconium dioxide and titanium: an in vitro study. Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R; Rotkina L; Zbären C; Enkling N; Blatz MB Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 23025489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An in vitro study using confocal laser scanning microscopy to evaluate the marginal misfits of different implant-supported frameworks. Tonin BSH; Fu J; Peixoto RF; Fischer NG; Fernandes RM; Curylofo PA; de Mattos MDGC; Macedo AP; de Almeida RP J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38305664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Volumetric misfit in CAD/CAM and cast implant frameworks: a university laboratory study. Almasri R; Drago CJ; Siegel SC; Hardigan PC J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):267-74. PubMed ID: 21492296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fit of CAD/CAM implant frameworks: a comprehensive review. Abduo J J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):758-66. PubMed ID: 25506666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro precision of fit of computer-aided designed and computer-aided manufactured titanium screw-retained fixed dental prostheses before and after ceramic veneering. Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R; Enkling N; Katsoulis K; Blatz MB Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 24289301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of fit of CNC-milled titanium and zirconia frameworks to implants. Abduo J; Lyons K; Waddell N; Bennani V; Swain M Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e20-9. PubMed ID: 21414138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation and comparison of vertical marginal fit of three different types of multiunit screw-retained framework fabricated for an implant-supported prosthesis - An Singh M; Yadav BK; Phukela SS; Ritwal P; Nagpal A; Saluja P J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(3):240-248. PubMed ID: 36511053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of fit on implants of chrome cobalt versus titanium frameworks made by cad / cam milling. Oteiza-Galdón B; Martínez-González A; Escuder ÁV J Clin Exp Dent; 2020 Oct; 12(10):e951-e957. PubMed ID: 33154797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of fit accuracy between Procera custom abutments and three implant systems. Alves da Cunha Tde M; Correia de Araújo RP; Barbosa da Rocha PV; Pazos Amoedo RM Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Oct; 14(5):772-7. PubMed ID: 20977612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of material selection on the passivity of fit of implant-supported restorations created with computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture. Karl M; Taylor TD Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):739-45. PubMed ID: 21841982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the fit of CAD/CAM abutments. Hamilton A; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Evans C Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(4):370-80. PubMed ID: 23837169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of commercially pure titanium and alternative dental alloys on the marginal fit of one-piece cast implant frameworks. de Torres EM; Rodrigues RC; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF J Dent; 2007 Oct; 35(10):800-5. PubMed ID: 17825466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]