These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26200153)

  • 21. Volumetric determination of the amount of misfit in CAD/CAM and cast implant frameworks: a multicenter laboratory study.
    Drago C; Saldarriaga RL; Domagala D; Almasri R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):920-9. PubMed ID: 20862405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Implant/abutment vertical misfit of one-piece cast frameworks made with different materials.
    Barbosa GA; das Neves FD; de Mattos Mda G; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF
    Braz Dent J; 2010; 21(6):515-9. PubMed ID: 21271041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three-dimensional accuracy of CAD/CAM titanium and ceramic superstructures for implant abutments using spiral scan microtomography.
    Prasad R; Al-Kheraif AA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(5):451-7. PubMed ID: 23998143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Retentive strength of two-piece CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutments.
    Gehrke P; Alius J; Fischer C; Erdelt KJ; Beuer F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):920-5. PubMed ID: 23527950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro precision of fit of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing titanium and zirconium dioxide bars.
    Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R; Yates DM; Izutani N; Enkling N; Blatz MB
    Dent Mater; 2013 Sep; 29(9):945-53. PubMed ID: 23890960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of vertical misfit of titanium and zirconia frameworks on peri-implant strain.
    Abduo J; Swain M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):529-36. PubMed ID: 22616045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with CAD/CAM-fabricated porcelain crown and zirconia-based framework.
    Takaba M; Tanaka S; Ishiura Y; Baba K
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 23289495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fit of screw-retained fixed implant frameworks fabricated by different methods: a systematic review.
    Abduo J; Lyons K; Bennani V; Waddell N; Swain M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):207-20. PubMed ID: 21519567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
    Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On cobalt-chrome frameworks in implant dentistry.
    Hjalmarsson L
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2009; (201):3-83. PubMed ID: 20143574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments.
    Kim S; Kim HI; Brewer JD; Monaco EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 19328275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of fit accuracy between Procera® custom abutments and three implant systems.
    de Morais Alves da Cunha T; de Araújo RP; da Rocha PV; Amoedo RM
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 14(6):890-5. PubMed ID: 21176100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of misfit and stress distribution in implant-retained prosthesis obtained by different methods.
    Tonin BSH; Peixoto RF; Fu J; Freitas BN; Mattos MDGC; Macedo AP
    Braz Dent J; 2021; 32(5):67-76. PubMed ID: 34877979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fracture force of cantilevered zirconia frameworks: an in vitro study.
    Chong KK; Palamara J; Wong RH; Judge RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):849-56. PubMed ID: 24836535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of cyclic loading on the vertical microgap of long-span zirconia frameworks supported by 4 or 6 implants.
    Tiossi R; Gomes EA; Lapria Faria AC; Silveira Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):828-33. PubMed ID: 24795260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Passive fit and time efficiency for prefabricated versus conventionally constructed cobalt chromium CAD\CAM 3-unit implant supported frameworks in free end saddle models: a pilot invitro study.
    Kamel ME; Alsayed AAE; ElKhashab MA; Nader N; Radi IA
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Oct; 24(1):1225. PubMed ID: 39407141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Misfit simulation on implant prostheses with different combinations of engaging and nonengaging titanium bases. Part 1: Stereomicroscopic assessment of the active and passive fit.
    Rutkunas V; Dirse J; Kules D; Simonaitis T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Apr; 129(4):589-596. PubMed ID: 35527068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An alternative section method for casting and posterior laser welding of metallic frameworks for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    de Aguiar FA; Tiossi R; Rodrigues RC; Mattos Mde G; Ribeiro RF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 19141050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.