These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26200153)

  • 41. Strain development of screw-retained implant-supported fixed restorations: procera implant bridge versus conventionally cast restorations.
    Karl M; Holst S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):166-9. PubMed ID: 22371839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Misfit of Implant-Supported Zirconia (Y-TZP) CAD-CAM Framework Compared to Non-Zirconia Frameworks: A Systematic Review.
    Alsayed HD
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Sep; 58(10):. PubMed ID: 36295507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Correlation between vertical misfits and stresses transmitted to implants from metal frameworks.
    de Torres EM; Barbosa GA; Bernardes SR; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1735-9. PubMed ID: 21497352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Passivity of Fit of a Novel Prefabricated Implant-Supported Mandibular Full-Arch Reconstruction: A Comparative In Vitro Study.
    Karl M; Carretta R; Higuchi KW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(5):440–442. PubMed ID: 29772033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Biomechanical behavior of CAD/CAM cobalt-chromium and zirconia full-arch fixed prostheses.
    Barbin T; Silva LDR; Velôso DV; Borges GA; Presotto AGC; Barão VAR; Groppo FC; Ferraz Mesquita M
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 12(6):329-337. PubMed ID: 33489016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
    Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
    Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Strength influencing variables on CAD/CAM zirconia frameworks.
    Wang H; Aboushelib MN; Feilzer AJ
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):633-8. PubMed ID: 17765301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. ACCURACY OF REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURE METAL FRAMEWORKS FABRICATED BY COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN/ COMPUTER-AIDED MANUFACTURING METHOD: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.
    Mai HY; Mai HN; Kim HJ; Lee J; Lee DH
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2022 Sep; 22(3):101681. PubMed ID: 36162896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Deformation of implant abutments after framework connection using strain gauges.
    Hollweg H; Jacques LB; da Silva Moura M; Bianco VC; Souza EA; Rubo JH
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 22568468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Strain development in 3-unit implant-supported CAD/CAM restorations.
    Karl M; Wichmann MG; Heckmann SM; Krafft T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):648-52. PubMed ID: 18807560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. CAD/CAM vs Conventional Technique for Fabrication of Implant-Supported Frameworks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of In Vitro Studies.
    Mello CC; Lemos CAA; de Luna Gomes JM; Verri FR; Pellizzer EP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(2):182-192. PubMed ID: 30856643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques.
    Takahashi T; Gunne J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 12644800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Modified section method for laser-welding of ill-fitting cp Ti and Ni-Cr alloy one-piece cast implant-supported frameworks.
    Tiossi R; Falcão-Filho H; Aguiar Júnior FA; Rodrigues RC; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 20149062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. CAD / CAM dental systems in implant dentistry: update.
    Fuster-Torres MA; Albalat-Estela S; Alcañiz-Raya M; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2009 Mar; 14(3):E141-5. PubMed ID: 19242395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: comparison of gaps at the prosthetic-abutment interface when cycled abutments are replaced with as-manufactured abutments.
    Hecker DM; Eckert SE; Choi YG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jan; 95(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 16399272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks.
    Al-Fadda SA; Zarb GA; Finer Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 17455431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique.
    Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Marginal and internal fits of fixed dental prostheses zirconia retainers.
    Beuer F; Aggstaller H; Edelhoff D; Gernet W; Sorensen J
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 18620749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The three-dimensional casting distortion of five implant-supported frameworks.
    Mitha T; Owen CP; Howes DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):248-50. PubMed ID: 19548406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.