209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26200475)
1. Gray-scale and color Doppler sonographic features of complex fibroadenomas of the breast.
Lee KH; Kim SJ; Park YM; Kim W; Yoon JH; Song JW; Kim SH; Lim YJ; Baek HJ; Kim SJ; Lee Y
J Clin Ultrasound; 2015; 43(9):556-62. PubMed ID: 26200475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sonographic appearances of juvenile fibroadenoma of the breast.
Kim SJ; Park YM; Jung SJ; Lee KH; Kim OH; Ryu JH; Choi GB; Lee SJ; Choo HJ; Jeong HW
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Nov; 33(11):1879-84. PubMed ID: 25336474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation.
Elverici E; Barça AN; Aktaş H; Özsoy A; Zengin B; Çavuşoğlu M; Araz L
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 25835079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of BI-RADS-MRI descriptors for differentiation between mucinous carcinoma and fibroadenoma.
Igarashi T; Ashida H; Morikawa K; Motohashi K; Fukuda K
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1092-8. PubMed ID: 27161057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions?
Tozaki M; Fukuma E
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):706-10. PubMed ID: 21596798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Utility of the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Category 4 Breast Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Study in China.
Gu Y; Tian JW; Ran HT; Ren WD; Chang C; Yuan JJ; Kang CS; Deng YB; Wang H; Luo BM; Guo SL; Zhou Q; Xue ES; Zhan WW; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang CQ; Chen M; Gu Y; Xu JF; Chen W; Zhang YH; Wang HQ; Li JC; Wang HY; Jiang YX
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S26-S34. PubMed ID: 32768352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5.
Fu CY; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Hsu KF; Chan DC; Ku CH; Lu TC; Chu CH
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 20603785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Ultrasound Elastography and Color Doppler Ultrasonography for Distinguishing Small Triple-Negative Breast Cancer From Fibroadenoma.
Yeo SH; Kim GR; Lee SH; Moon WK
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Sep; 37(9):2135-2146. PubMed ID: 29424448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High resolution compression elastography and color doppler sonography in characterization of breast fibroadenoma.
Rjosk-Dendorfer D; Reu S; Deak Z; Hetterich H; Kolben T; Reiser M; Clevert DA
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2014; 58(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 25227197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonographic features of histopathologically benign solid breast lesions that have been classified as BI-RADS 4 on sonography.
Taskin F; Koseoglu K; Ozbas S; Erkus M; Karaman C
J Clin Ultrasound; 2012 Jun; 40(5):261-5. PubMed ID: 22508447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of breast ultrasound color Doppler vascular pattern morphology improves diagnostic sensitivity with minimal change in specificity.
Svensson WE; Pandian AJ; Hashimoto H
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):466-74. PubMed ID: 20094978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simple and complex fibroadenomas: are there any distinguishing sonographic features?
Pinto J; Aguiar AT; Duarte H; Vilaverde F; Rodrigues Â; Krug JL
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Mar; 33(3):415-9. PubMed ID: 24567452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound.
Lee HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Youk JH; Lee JY; Kang DR; Oh KK
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 17531417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.
Heinig J; Witteler R; Schmitz R; Kiesel L; Steinhard J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Texture Analysis of Ultrasound Images to Differentiate Simple Fibroadenomas From Complex Fibroadenomas and Benign Phyllodes Tumors.
Basara Akin I; Ozgul H; Simsek K; Altay C; Secil M; Balci P
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Oct; 39(10):1993-2003. PubMed ID: 32329531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound characteristics of breast fibroadenomas are related to clinical and histological parameters.
Földi M; Klar M; Orlowska-Volk M; Hanjalic-Beck A; Osterloh B; Stickeler E; Watermann D
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):475-83. PubMed ID: 19544233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features.
Hong AS; Rosen EL; Soo MS; Baker JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Apr; 184(4):1260-5. PubMed ID: 15788607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency of Categories 4 and 5 of the Second Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Diagnosing Breast Lesions.
Zou X; Wang J; Lan X; Lin Q; Han F; Liu L; Li A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2065-71. PubMed ID: 27262521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Imaging features of benign adenomyoepithelioma of the breast.
Park YM; Park JS; Jung HS; Yoon HK; Yang WT
J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 May; 41(4):218-23. PubMed ID: 23325754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
