162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26200519)
1. Dimensional error of three-dimensional images generated by different software.
Pimentel PA; Bomfim RT; Andrade LC; Ferraz EG; Ribeiro Lamberti PL; Rubira-Bullen IR; Sarmento VA
J Med Eng Technol; 2015; 39(8):480-4. PubMed ID: 26200519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vertical bone measurements from cone beam computed tomography images using different software packages.
Vasconcelos TV; Neves FS; Moraes LA; Freitas DQ
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Linear measurement accuracy of CBCT panoramic reconstructions: experimental study with dry human mandibles.
Almeida VSM; Bomfim RT; Sobreira ACR; Barbosa IDS; Leite-Ribeiro PM; Rubira-Bullen IR; Sarmento VA
Oral Radiol; 2021 Jul; 37(3):421-426. PubMed ID: 32936399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and medical computed tomography: implications for clinical diagnostics with guided surgery.
Abboud M; Calvo-Guirado JL; Orentlicher G; Wahl G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):536-42. PubMed ID: 23527357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lagravère MO; Carey J; Toogood RW; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):112-6. PubMed ID: 18617110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position.
Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Sanderink G
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 19106265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The reliability of computed tomography (CT) values and dimensional measurements of the oropharyngeal region using cone beam CT: comparison with multidetector CT.
Yamashina A; Tanimoto K; Sutthiprapaporn P; Hayakawa Y
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):245-51. PubMed ID: 18606745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT). Part II: On 3D model accuracy.
Liang X; Lambrichts I; Sun Y; Denis K; Hassan B; Li L; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 19423257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the accuracy of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography and micro-computed tomography reconstructions by using different voxel sizes.
Maret D; Peters OA; Galibourg A; Dumoncel J; Esclassan R; Kahn JL; Sixou M; Telmon N
J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1321-6. PubMed ID: 25146011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):16.e1-6; discussion 16-7. PubMed ID: 20122425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of linear measurements on 3D surface models using CBCT data segmentation obtained by automatic standard pre-set thresholds in two segmentation software programs: an in vitro study.
Poleti ML; Fernandes TM; Pagin O; Moretti MR; Rubira-Bullen IR
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jan; 20(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 25963719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new, highly precise measurement technology for the in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of digital imaging data.
von Wilmowsky C; Bergauer B; Nkenke E; Neukam FW; Neuhuber W; Lell M; Keller A; Eitner S; Matta RE
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1335-9. PubMed ID: 26189144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro comparison of the effect of different slice thicknesses on the accuracy of linear measurements on cone beam computed tomography images in implant sites.
Shokri A; Khajeh S
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 25569395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating craniofacial asymmetry with digital cephalometric images and cone-beam computed tomography.
de Moraes ME; Hollender LG; Chen CS; Moraes LC; Balducci I
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e523-31. PubMed ID: 21640864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Segmentation process significantly influences the accuracy of 3D surface models derived from cone beam computed tomography.
Fourie Z; Damstra J; Schepers RH; Gerrits PO; Ren Y
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e524-30. PubMed ID: 21733649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ex vivo measurement reliability using two different cbct scanners for orthodontic purposes.
Dalessandri D; Bracco P; Paganelli C; Hernandez Soler V; Martin C
Int J Med Robot; 2012 Jun; 8(2):230-42. PubMed ID: 22315209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: an in vitro study.
Fernandes TM; Adamczyk J; Poleti ML; Henriques JF; Friedland B; Garib DG
J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25004053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements.
Baumgaertel S; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. PubMed ID: 19577143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
