376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26200541)
1. Feasibility, complications and oncologic results of a limited inguinal lymph node dissection in the management of penile cancer.
Tsaur I; Biegel C; Gust K; Huesch T; Borgmann H; Brandt MP; Kurosch M; Reiter M; Bartsch G; Schilling D; Haferkamp A
Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(3):486-95. PubMed ID: 26200541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy achieve a lower morbidity than open lymph node dissection in penile cancer patients?
Tobias-Machado M; Tavares A; Silva MN; Molina WR; Forseto PH; Juliano RV; Wroclawski ER
J Endourol; 2008 Aug; 22(8):1687-91. PubMed ID: 18657031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: a new minimally invasive procedure for radical management of inguinal nodes in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.
Tobias-Machado M; Tavares A; Ornellas AA; Molina WR; Juliano RV; Wroclawski ER
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):953-7; discussion 958. PubMed ID: 17296386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term followup of penile carcinoma with high risk for lymph node invasion treated with inguinal lymphadenectomy.
Marconnet L; Rigaud J; Bouchot O
J Urol; 2010 Jun; 183(6):2227-32. PubMed ID: 20399455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morbidity of inguinal lymphadenectomy for invasive penile carcinoma.
Bouchot O; Rigaud J; Maillet F; Hetet JF; Karam G
Eur Urol; 2004 Jun; 45(6):761-5; discussion 765-6. PubMed ID: 15149749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accurate staging of carcinoma of the penis in men with nonpalpable inguinal lymph nodes by modified inguinal lymphadenectomy.
Parra RO
J Urol; 1996 Feb; 155(2):560-3. PubMed ID: 8558660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: surgical and oncological results.
Romanelli P; Nishimoto R; Suarez R; Decia R; Abreu D; Machado M; Arroyo C; Campolo H; Campos E; Carlos AS; Tobias-Machado M
Actas Urol Esp; 2013 May; 37(5):305-10. PubMed ID: 23433745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Management of the lymph nodes in penile cancer.
Heyns CF; Fleshner N; Sangar V; Schlenker B; Yuvaraja TB; van Poppel H
Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2 Suppl 1):S43-57. PubMed ID: 20691885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional, oncologic, and technical outcomes after endoscopic groin dissection for penile carcinoma.
Canter DJ; Dobbs RW; Jafri SM; Herrel LA; Ogan K; Delman KA; Master VA
Can J Urol; 2012 Aug; 19(4):6395-400. PubMed ID: 22892266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contemporary morbidity from lymphadenectomy for penile squamous cell carcinoma: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience.
Bevan-Thomas R; Slaton JW; Pettaway CA
J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1638-42. PubMed ID: 11912379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy vs Open Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Carcinoma Penis: Expanding Role and Comparison of Outcomes.
Yadav SS; Tomar V; Bhattar R; Jha AK; Priyadarshi S
Urology; 2018 Mar; 113():79-84. PubMed ID: 29155185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modified technique of radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: morbidity and outcome.
Yao K; Tu H; Li YH; Qin ZK; Liu ZW; Zhou FJ; Han H
J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):546-52. PubMed ID: 20620415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospectively packaged ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: the disseminative pattern of lymph node metastasis.
Zhu Y; Zhang SL; Ye DW; Yao XD; Dai B; Zhang HL; Shen YJ; Zhu YP; Shi GH; Ma CG
J Urol; 2009 May; 181(5):2103-8. PubMed ID: 19286211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in Survival Associated with Performance of Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Invasive Penile Cancer: Results from the National Cancer Database.
Correa AF; Handorf E; Joshi SS; Geynisman DM; Kutikov A; Chen DY; Uzzo RG; Viterbo R; Greenberg RE; Smaldone MC
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1238-1244. PubMed ID: 29248557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radical open inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: surgical technique, early complications and late outcomes.
Koifman L; Hampl D; Koifman N; Vides AJ; Ornellas AA
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2086-92. PubMed ID: 23770135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot-Assisted Simultaneous Bilateral Radical Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Along with Robotic Bilateral Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: A Feasibility Study.
Ahlawat R; Khera R; Gautam G; Kumar A
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Nov; 26(11):845-849. PubMed ID: 27243665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of penile cancer.
Protzel C; Alcaraz A; Horenblas S; Pizzocaro G; Zlotta A; Hakenberg OW
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1075-88. PubMed ID: 19264390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modified radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis: technique and results.
Jacobellis U
J Urol; 2003 Apr; 169(4):1349-52. PubMed ID: 12629358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fascia lata preservation during inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: rationale and outcome.
Yao K; Zou ZJ; Li ZS; Zhou FJ; Qin ZK; Liu ZW; Li YH; Han H
Urology; 2013 Sep; 82(3):642-7. PubMed ID: 23876593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lymph node metastasis in intermediate-risk penile squamous cell cancer: a two-centre experience.
Hughes BE; Leijte JA; Kroon BK; Shabbir MA; Swallow TW; Heenan SD; Corbishley CM; van Boven HH; Perry MJ; Watkin NA; Horenblas S
Eur Urol; 2010 Apr; 57(4):688-92. PubMed ID: 19647926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
