These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Using Contact Forces and Robot Arm Accelerations to Automatically Rate Surgeon Skill at Peg Transfer. Brown JD; O Brien CE; Leung SC; Dumon KR; Lee DI; Kuchenbecker KJ IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Sep; 64(9):2263-2275. PubMed ID: 28113295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of Robotic Console Skills (ARCS): construct validity of a novel global rating scale for technical skills in robotically assisted surgery. Liu M; Purohit S; Mazanetz J; Allen W; Kreaden US; Curet M Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):526-535. PubMed ID: 28667546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool. Ramos P; Montez J; Tripp A; Ng CK; Gill IS; Hung AJ BJU Int; 2014 May; 113(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 24224500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices. Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics. Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a Novel Inverted Peg Transfer Task: Advancing Beyond the Regular Peg Transfer Task for Surgical Simulation-Based Assessment. Abdelrahman AM; Yu D; Lowndes BR; Buckarma EH; Gas BL; Farley DR; Bingener J; Hallbeck MS J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):836-843. PubMed ID: 29037821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience. Park YS; Oo AM; Son SY; Shin DJ; Jung DH; Ahn SH; Park DJ; Kim HH Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1485-90. PubMed ID: 26139502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. External validation of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS). Aghazadeh MA; Jayaratna IS; Hung AJ; Pan MM; Desai MM; Gill IS; Goh AC Surg Endosc; 2015 Nov; 29(11):3261-6. PubMed ID: 25609318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Which skills really matter? proving face, content, and construct validity for a commercial robotic simulator. Lyons C; Goldfarb D; Jones SL; Badhiwala N; Miles B; Link R; Dunkin BJ Surg Endosc; 2013 Jun; 27(6):2020-30. PubMed ID: 23389060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation study of a virtual reality robotic simulator--role as an assessment tool? Lee JY; Mucksavage P; Kerbl DC; Huynh VB; Etafy M; McDougall EM J Urol; 2012 Mar; 187(3):998-1002. PubMed ID: 22264455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Video assessment of laparoscopic skills by novices and experts: implications for surgical education. Yeung C; Carrillo B; Pope V; Hosseinpour S; Gerstle JT; Azzie G Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):3883-3889. PubMed ID: 28205036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A study of crowdsourced segment-level surgical skill assessment using pairwise rankings. Malpani A; Vedula SS; Chen CC; Hager GD Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Sep; 10(9):1435-47. PubMed ID: 26133652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a technical checklist for the assessment of suturing in robotic surgery. Guni A; Raison N; Challacombe B; Khan S; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4402-4407. PubMed ID: 30194643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development, feasibility, validity, and reliability of a scale for objective assessment of operative performance in laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. Zevin B; Bonrath EM; Aggarwal R; Dedy NJ; Ahmed N; Grantcharov TP; J Am Coll Surg; 2013 May; 216(5):955-965.e8; quiz 1029-31, 1033. PubMed ID: 23490542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skill: A Valid Method for Discriminating Basic Robotic Surgery Skills. White LW; Kowalewski TM; Dockter RL; Comstock B; Hannaford B; Lendvay TS J Endourol; 2015 Nov; 29(11):1295-301. PubMed ID: 26057232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Identifying Surgical Actions and Measuring Performance. Khalid S; Goldenberg M; Grantcharov T; Taati B; Rudzicz F JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Mar; 3(3):e201664. PubMed ID: 32227178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. Goh AC; Goldfarb DW; Sander JC; Miles BJ; Dunkin BJ J Urol; 2012 Jan; 187(1):247-52. PubMed ID: 22099993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]