436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26202553)
1. Intraoperative Assessment of Final Margins with a Handheld Optical Imaging Probe During Breast-Conserving Surgery May Reduce the Reoperation Rate: Results of a Multicenter Study.
Zysk AM; Chen K; Gabrielson E; Tafra L; May Gonzalez EA; Canner JK; Schneider EB; Cittadine AJ; Scott Carney P; Boppart SA; Tsuchiya K; Sawyer K; Jacobs LK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):3356-62. PubMed ID: 26202553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.
Chagpar AB; Killelea BK; Tsangaris TN; Butler M; Stavris K; Li F; Yao X; Bossuyt V; Harigopal M; Lannin DR; Pusztai L; Horowitz NR
N Engl J Med; 2015 Aug; 373(6):503-10. PubMed ID: 26028131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of intra-operative margin management techniques in breast-conserving surgery: a standardised approach reduces the likelihood of residual disease without increasing operative time.
Bolger JC; Solon JG; Khan SA; Hill AD; Power CP
Breast Cancer; 2015 May; 22(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 23649303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Resection margins in ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Olsha O; Shemesh D; Carmon M; Sibirsky O; Abu Dalo R; Rivkin L; Ashkenazi I
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 20734147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.
Merrill AL; Coopey SB; Tang R; McEvoy MP; Specht MC; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Smith BL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 26467458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasound-guided excision combined with intraoperative assessment of gross macroscopic margins decreases the rate of reoperations for non-palpable invasive breast cancer.
Ramos M; Díaz JC; Ramos T; Ruano R; Aparicio M; Sancho M; González-Orús JM
Breast; 2013 Aug; 22(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 23110817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Intraoperative Margin Assessment during Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Park KU; Kuerer HM; Rauch GM; Leung JWT; Sahin AA; Wei W; Li Y; Black DM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):1720-1728. PubMed ID: 30877499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of routine cavity shave margins on breast cancer re-excision rates.
Kobbermann A; Unzeitig A; Xie XJ; Yan J; Euhus D; Peng Y; Sarode V; Moldrem A; Marilyn Leitch A; Andrews V; Stallings C; Rao R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 May; 18(5):1349-55. PubMed ID: 21046260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Ali I; Feldman SM; Cohen JM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2940-5. PubMed ID: 17632761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cavity Shaving Reduces Involved Margins and Reinterventions Without Increasing Costs in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Corsi F; Sorrentino L; Bonzini M; Bossi D; Truffi M; Amadori R; Nebuloni M; Brillat B; Mazzucchelli S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jun; 24(6):1516-1524. PubMed ID: 28116620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Should breast density influence patient selection for breast-conserving surgery?
Kapoor NS; Eaton A; King TA; Patil S; Stempel M; Morris E; Brogi E; Morrow M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Feb; 20(2):600-6. PubMed ID: 22941162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Reduces Mastectomy and Postoperative Re-excision Rates.
Crown A; Wechter DG; Grumley JW
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):3363-8. PubMed ID: 26208579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery.
Fleming FJ; Hill AD; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins NJ; Quinn CM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 30(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 15028301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usefulness of magnetic resonance in patients with invasive cancer eligible for breast conservation: a comparative study.
Fancellu A; Soro D; Castiglia P; Marras V; Melis M; Cottu P; Cherchi A; Spanu A; Mulas S; Pusceddu C; Simbula L; Meloni GB
Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Apr; 14(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 24321101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraoperative radiological margin assessment in breast-conserving surgery.
Ihrai T; Quaranta D; Fouche Y; Machiavello JC; Raoust I; Chapellier C; Maestro C; Marcy M; Ferrero JM; Flipo B
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Apr; 40(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 24468296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margin assessment with use of MarginProbe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies.
Schnabel F; Boolbol SK; Gittleman M; Karni T; Tafra L; Feldman S; Police A; Friedman NB; Karlan S; Holmes D; Willey SC; Carmon M; Fernandez K; Akbari S; Harness J; Guerra L; Frazier T; Lane K; Simmons RM; Estabrook A; Allweis T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 May; 21(5):1589-95. PubMed ID: 24595800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rate of re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma.
Wanis ML; Wong JA; Rodriguez S; Wong JM; Jabo B; Ashok A; Lum SS; Solomon NL; Reeves ME; Garberoglio CA; Senthil M
Am Surg; 2013 Oct; 79(10):1119-22. PubMed ID: 24160812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
