These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26203233)

  • 1. Older adults' preferences for colorectal cancer-screening test attributes and test choice.
    Kistler CE; Hess TM; Howard K; Pignone MP; Crutchfield TM; Hawley ST; Brenner AT; Ward KT; Lewis CL
    Patient Prefer Adherence; 2015; 9():1005-16. PubMed ID: 26203233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating the preferences and willingness-to-pay for colorectal cancer screening: an opportunity to incorporate the perspective of population at risk into policy development in Thailand.
    Phisalprapa P; Ngorsuraches S; Wanishayakorn T; Kositamongkol C; Supakankunti S; Chaiyakunapruk N
    J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):226-233. PubMed ID: 33467947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
    Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing 3 values clarification methods for colorectal cancer screening decision-making: a randomized trial in the US and Australia.
    Brenner A; Howard K; Lewis C; Sheridan S; Crutchfield T; Hawley S; Reuland D; Kistler C; Pignone M
    J Gen Intern Med; 2014 Mar; 29(3):507-13. PubMed ID: 24272830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using a discrete choice experiment to inform the design of programs to promote colon cancer screening for vulnerable populations in North Carolina.
    Pignone MP; Crutchfield TM; Brown PM; Hawley ST; Laping JL; Lewis CL; Lich KH; Richardson LC; Tangka FK; Wheeler SB
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2014 Nov; 14():611. PubMed ID: 25433801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attributes in stated preference elicitation studies on colorectal cancer screening and their relative importance for decision-making among screenees: a systematic review.
    Brinkmann M; Fricke LM; Diedrich L; Robra BP; Krauth C; Dreier M
    Health Econ Rev; 2022 Sep; 12(1):49. PubMed ID: 36136248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advancing Colorectal Cancer Detection With Blood-Based Tests: Qualitative Study and Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit Population Preferences.
    Ong C; Cook AR; Tan KK; Wang Y
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2024 Jul; 10():e53200. PubMed ID: 39018093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Labeled versus unlabeled discrete choice experiments in health economics: an application to colorectal cancer screening.
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Hol L; Donkers B; van Dam L; Habbema JD; van Leerdam ME; Kuipers EJ; Essink-Bot ML; Steyerberg EW
    Value Health; 2010; 13(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 19912597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How psychological distance of a study sample in discrete choice experiments affects preference measurement: a colorectal cancer screening case study.
    Veldwijk J; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM; Kihlbom U; Langenskiöld S; Dekker E; Kallenberg FGJ; de Wit GA; Lambooij MS
    Patient Prefer Adherence; 2019; 13():273-282. PubMed ID: 30863017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attributes Characterizing Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests That Influence Preferences of Individuals Eligible for Screening in Germany: A Qualitative Study.
    Brinkmann M; von Holt I; Diedrich L; Krauth C; Seidel G; Dreier M
    Patient Prefer Adherence; 2022; 16():2051-2066. PubMed ID: 35975173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eliciting population preferences for mass colorectal cancer screening organization.
    Nayaradou M; Berchi C; Dejardin O; Launoy G
    Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(2):224-33. PubMed ID: 19692710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening using a choice-format survey.
    Marshall DA; Johnson FR; Phillips KA; Marshall JK; Thabane L; Kulin NA
    Value Health; 2007; 10(5):415-30. PubMed ID: 17888107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of sample type and procedural attributes on relative acceptability of different colorectal cancer screening regimens.
    Osborne JM; Flight I; Wilson CJ; Chen G; Ratcliffe J; Young GP
    Patient Prefer Adherence; 2018; 12():1825-1836. PubMed ID: 30271126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding the Preferences and Considerations of the Public Towards Risk-Stratified Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Insights From Think-Aloud Interviews Based on a Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Dennison RA; Clune RJ; Morris S; Thomas C; Usher-Smith JA
    Health Expect; 2024 Aug; 27(4):e14153. PubMed ID: 39030943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How do physician assessments of patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests differ from actual preferences? A comparison in Canada and the United States using a stated-choice survey.
    Marshall DA; Johnson FR; Kulin NA; Ozdemir S; Walsh JM; Marshall JK; Van Bebber S; Phillips KA
    Health Econ; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1420-39. PubMed ID: 19191268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An empirical comparison of methods for analyzing correlated data from a discrete choice survey to elicit patient preference for colorectal cancer screening.
    Cheng J; Pullenayegum E; Marshall DA; Marshall JK; Thabane L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Feb; 12():15. PubMed ID: 22348526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preferences of Iranian average risk population for colorectal cancer screening tests.
    Ramezani Doroh V; Delavari A; Yaseri M; Emamgholipour Sefiddashti S; Akbarisari A
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2019 May; 32(4):677-687. PubMed ID: 31111783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing Discrete Choice Experiment with Swing Weighting to Estimate Attribute Relative Importance: A Case Study in Lung Cancer Patient Preferences.
    Veldwijk J; Smith IP; Oliveri S; Petrocchi S; Smith MY; Lanzoni L; Janssens R; Huys I; de Wit GA; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
    Med Decis Making; 2024 Feb; 44(2):203-216. PubMed ID: 38178591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conjoint analysis versus rating and ranking for values elicitation and clarification in colorectal cancer screening.
    Pignone MP; Brenner AT; Hawley S; Sheridan SL; Lewis CL; Jonas DE; Howard K
    J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jan; 27(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 21870192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) Questionnaire to Understand Veterans' Preferences for Tobacco Treatment in Primary Care.
    Katz DA; Stewart KR; Paez M; Vander Weg MW; Grant KM; Hamlin C; Gaeth G
    Patient; 2018 Dec; 11(6):649-663. PubMed ID: 29855976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.