391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26204283)
1. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of the Benign Central Zone of the Prostate: Comparison With Low- and High-Grade Prostate Cancer.
Gupta RT; Kauffman CR; Garcia-Reyes K; Palmeri ML; Madden JF; Polascik TJ; Rosenkrantz AB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 26204283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Apparent diffusion coefficient value and ratio as noninvasive potential biomarkers to predict prostate cancer grading: comparison with prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen.
De Cobelli F; Ravelli S; Esposito A; Giganti F; Gallina A; Montorsi F; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Mar; 204(3):550-7. PubMed ID: 25714284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective Inclusion of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients in Multiparametric Prostate MRI Structured Reports: Discrimination of Clinically Insignificant and Significant Cancers.
Costa DN; Xi Y; Aziz M; Passoni N; Shakir N; Goldberg K; Francis F; Roehrborn CG; Leon AD; Pedrosa I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Jan; 212(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 30383404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: Using ADC and ADC Ratio in Determining Gleason Score.
Woo S; Kim SY; Cho JY; Kim SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 27077643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does normalisation improve the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient values for prostate cancer assessment? A blinded independent-observer evaluation.
Rosenkrantz AB; Khalef V; Xu W; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Doshi AM
Clin Radiol; 2015 Sep; 70(9):1032-7. PubMed ID: 26126712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer.
Hambrock T; Somford DM; Huisman HJ; van Oort IM; Witjes JA; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Scheenen T; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):453-61. PubMed ID: 21502392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3 T for differentiation of malignant and benign tissue in transition and peripheral zones: preliminary results.
Kim CK; Park BK; Han JJ; Kang TW; Lee HM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 17538295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained using high b-values with a 3-T MRI correlate better than a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy with true Gleason scores obtained from radical prostatectomy specimens for patients with prostate cancer?
Kitajima K; Takahashi S; Ueno Y; Miyake H; Fujisawa M; Kawakami F; Sugimura K
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):1219-26. PubMed ID: 23518144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantified analysis of histological components and architectural patterns of gleason grades in apparent diffusion coefficient restricted areas upon diffusion weighted MRI for peripheral or transition zone cancer locations.
Helfrich O; Puech P; Betrouni N; Pinçon C; Ouzzane A; Rizk J; Marcq G; Randazzo M; Durand M; Lakroum S; Leroy X; Villers A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1786-1796. PubMed ID: 28383776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MRI of the Prostate With and Without Endorectal Coil at 3 T: Correlation With Whole-Mount Histopathologic Gleason Score.
Dhatt R; Choy S; Co SJ; Ischia J; Kozlowski P; Harris AC; Jones EC; Black PC; Goldenberg SL; Chang SD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jul; 215(1):133-141. PubMed ID: 32160050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of aggressiveness of prostate cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with histologic grade after radical prostatectomy.
Verma S; Rajesh A; Morales H; Lemen L; Bills G; Delworth M; Gaitonde K; Ying J; Samartunga R; Lamba M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):374-81. PubMed ID: 21257890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate cancer vs. post-biopsy hemorrhage: diagnosis with T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging.
Rosenkrantz AB; Kopec M; Kong X; Melamed J; Dakwar G; Babb JS; Taouli B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1387-94. PubMed ID: 20512891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diffusion-weighted MRI of peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient with Gleason score and percentage of tumor on core biopsy.
Woodfield CA; Tung GA; Grand DJ; Pezzullo JA; Machan JT; Renzulli JF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):W316-22. PubMed ID: 20308476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values obtained using high b-value when diagnosing prostate cancer using 3 tesla MRI: comparison between ultra-high b-value (2000 s/mm²) and standard high b-value (1000 s/mm²).
Kitajima K; Takahashi S; Ueno Y; Yoshikawa T; Ohno Y; Obara M; Miyake H; Fujisawa M; Sugimura K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jul; 36(1):198-205. PubMed ID: 22371381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading in Intermediate-Risk 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer.
Rozenberg R; Thornhill RE; Flood TA; Hakim SW; Lim C; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):775-82. PubMed ID: 27003049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer.
Rosenkrantz AB; Sigmund EE; Johnson G; Babb JS; Mussi TC; Melamed J; Taneja SS; Lee VS; Jensen JH
Radiology; 2012 Jul; 264(1):126-35. PubMed ID: 22550312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differentiation of noncancerous tissue and cancer lesions by apparent diffusion coefficient values in transition and peripheral zones of the prostate.
Sato C; Naganawa S; Nakamura T; Kumada H; Miura S; Takizawa O; Ishigaki T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Mar; 21(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 15723379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Discriminating Low-Grade From High-Grade Prostate Cancer.
Vos EK; Kobus T; Litjens GJ; Hambrock T; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO; Maas MC; Scheenen TW
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):490-7. PubMed ID: 25867656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contribution of Histopathologic Tissue Composition to Quantitative MR Spectroscopy and Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Prostate.
Kobus T; van der Laak JA; Maas MC; Hambrock T; Bruggink CC; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Scheenen TW; Heerschap A
Radiology; 2016 Mar; 278(3):801-11. PubMed ID: 26418614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
