171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26204477)
1. Comparison of analytic methods for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data.
Chen P; Huang X
J Comput Biol; 2015 Nov; 22(11):988-96. PubMed ID: 26204477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new method for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data analysis.
Rao X; Lai D; Huang X
J Comput Biol; 2013 Sep; 20(9):703-11. PubMed ID: 23841653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A fixed-point algorithm for estimating amplification efficiency from a polymerase chain reaction dilution series.
Jones ME; Mayne GC; Wang T; Watson DI; Hussey DJ
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):372. PubMed ID: 25492416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis methods for precision, linearity, and accuracy of estimating amplification efficiency.
Tellinghuisen J; Spiess AN
Anal Biochem; 2014 Mar; 449():76-82. PubMed ID: 24365068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stepwise kinetic equilibrium models of quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Cobbs G
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Aug; 13():203. PubMed ID: 22897900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel data processing method CyC* for quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction minimizes cumulative error.
Zhang L; Dong R; Wei S; Zhou HC; Zhang MX; Alagarsamy K
PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0218159. PubMed ID: 31185064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pairwise efficiency: a new mathematical approach to qPCR data analysis increases the precision of the calibration curve assay.
Panina Y; Germond A; David BG; Watanabe TM
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 May; 20(1):295. PubMed ID: 31146686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Micro-droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction and Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Technologies Provide Highly Sensitive and Accurate Detection of Zika Virus.
Hui Y; Wu Z; Qin Z; Zhu L; Liang J; Li X; Fu H; Feng S; Yu J; He X; Lu W; Xiao W; Wu Q; Zhang B; Zhao W
Virol Sin; 2018 Jun; 33(3):270-277. PubMed ID: 29931514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A kinetic-based sigmoidal model for the polymerase chain reaction and its application to high-capacity absolute quantitative real-time PCR.
Rutledge RG; Stewart D
BMC Biotechnol; 2008 May; 8():47. PubMed ID: 18466619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of smoothing on parameter estimation in quantitative DNA amplification experiments.
Spiess AN; Deutschmann C; Burdukiewicz M; Himmelreich R; Klat K; Schierack P; Rödiger S
Clin Chem; 2015 Feb; 61(2):379-88. PubMed ID: 25477537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Statistical uncertainty and its propagation in the analysis of quantitative polymerase chain reaction data: comparison of methods.
Tellinghuisen J; Spiess AN
Anal Biochem; 2014 Nov; 464():94-102. PubMed ID: 24991688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative Analysis of Periodontal Pathogens Using Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR).
Marin MJ; Figuero E; Herrera D; Sanz M
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1537():191-202. PubMed ID: 27924595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis and Normalization of Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Experimental Data.
Green MR; Sambrook J
Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2018 Oct; 2018(10):. PubMed ID: 30275081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Application of recombinase polymerase amplification in the detection of
Jin XJ; Gong YL; Yang L; Mo BH; Peng YZ; He P; Zhao JN; Li XL
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 34(4):233-239. PubMed ID: 29690742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of DNA methylation specific droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and real time qPCR with flow cytometry in characterizing human T cells in peripheral blood.
Wiencke JK; Bracci PM; Hsuang G; Zheng S; Hansen H; Wrensch MR; Rice T; Eliot M; Kelsey KT
Epigenetics; 2014 Oct; 9(10):1360-5. PubMed ID: 25437051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Droplet Digital PCR and Real Time PCR Method for HBV DNA Quantification.
Wongjitrat C; Horthongkham N; Sutthent R; Srisurapanon S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2015 Oct; 98 Suppl 9():S140-5. PubMed ID: 26817223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Removal of artifact bias from qPCR results using DNA melting curve analysis.
Ruijter JM; Ruiz-Villalba A; van den Hoff AJJ; Gunst QD; Wittwer CT; van den Hoff MJB
FASEB J; 2019 Dec; 33(12):14542-14555. PubMed ID: 31682470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Expression profiling by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).
Lech M; Anders HJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1169():133-42. PubMed ID: 24957236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. qPCR data analysis: Better results through iconoclasm.
Tellinghuisen J; Spiess AN
Biomol Detect Quantif; 2019 Mar; 17():100084. PubMed ID: 31194178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Use of the real-time RT-PCR method for investigation of small stable RNA expression level in human epidermoid carcinoma cells A431].
Nikitina TV; Nazarova NIu; Tishchenko LI; Tuohimaa P; Sedova VM
Tsitologiia; 2003; 45(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 14520871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
