189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26204927)
21. Discriminating analysis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance of the uterine cervix using nuclear three-dimensional analysis.
Washiya K; Nakamura M; Mizuki Y; Motoi M; Kobayashi T; Yoshioka H; Watanabe J
Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 24247299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fractal analysis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Fabrizii M; Moinfar F; Jelinek HF; Karperien A; Ahammer H
PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e108457. PubMed ID: 25302712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantification of confocal fluorescence microscopy for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Sheikhzadeh F; Ward RK; Carraro A; Chen ZY; van Niekerk D; Miller D; Ehlen T; MacAulay CE; Follen M; Lane PM; Guillaud M
Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Oct; 14():96. PubMed ID: 26499452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Correlation discrepancies between high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a cytological/histological correlation study from a single-institution experience.
Zhang M; Carrozza M; Huang Y
Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 24335093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Novel optical detection system for in vivo identification and localization of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Schomacker KT; Meese TM; Jiang C; Abele CC; Dickson K; Sum ST; Flewelling RF
J Biomed Opt; 2006; 11(3):34009. PubMed ID: 16822059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Cervical biopsy: is the histological diagnosis reliable and reproducible? Utility of p16 INK4A in its achievement].
Curiel Valdés Jde J
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2007 Oct; 75(10):615-20. PubMed ID: 18800580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Risk of High-Grade Histopathology Diagnosed by Cervical Conization in Endocervical Curettage Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 1: A Case-Control Study.
Cong Q; Xiao J; Tao X; Sui L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jul; 24(3):247-251. PubMed ID: 32324695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic reproducibility of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 and atrophy in menopausal women on hematoxylin and eosin, Ki-67, and p16 stained slides.
Cremer ML; Alonzo TA; Alspach AE; Shulman IA; Cernosek S; Tsai S; Kalichanda N; Felix JC
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2010 Apr; 14(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 20354418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. p16INK4a immunohistochemistry improves interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Klaes R; Benner A; Friedrich T; Ridder R; Herrington S; Jenkins D; Kurman RJ; Schmidt D; Stoler M; von Knebel Doeberitz M
Am J Surg Pathol; 2002 Nov; 26(11):1389-99. PubMed ID: 12409715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. False negative colposcopy is associated with thinner cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and 3.
Yang B; Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang X; Burchette R; Qiao YL
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jul; 110(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 18485462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Adjunctive HPV in-situ hybridization (ISH) assay as an aid in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in cervical tissue specimens: an analytical and functional characterization.
Zhang W; Kapadia M; Sugarman M; Free H; Upchurch C; Gniewek R; White K; Miller M; Vladich F; Ferenczy A; Wright TC; Stoler MH; Pestic-Dragovich L
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2012 Nov; 31(6):588-95. PubMed ID: 23018222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The reproducibility of CIN diagnoses among different pathologists: data from histology reviews from a multicenter randomized study.
Dalla Palma P; Giorgi Rossi P; Collina G; Buccoliero AM; Ghiringhello B; Gilioli E; Onnis GL; Aldovini D; Galanti G; Casadei G; Aldi M; Gomes VV; Giubilato P; Ronco G;
Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Jul; 132(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 19864243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Fluorescence diagnosis with 5-ALA thermogel of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Andikyan V; Kronschnabl M; Hillemanns M; Wang X; Stepp H; Hillemanns P
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2004 Jan; 44(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 14673226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical significance of hTERC gene detection in exfoliated cervical epithelial cells for cervical lesions.
Zheng X; Liang P; Zheng Y; Yi P; Liu Q; Han J; Huang Y; Zhou Y; Guo J; Li L
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jun; 23(5):785-90. PubMed ID: 23669440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Image analysis of nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio in cervical smears to discriminate three grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Maeda MY; Di Loreto C; Shirata NK; Shih LW; Cavaliere MJ; Longatto Filho A; Alves VA
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(3):744-8. PubMed ID: 9167695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Fluorescence spectroscopy: a diagnostic tool for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).
Ramanujam N; Mitchell MF; Mahadevan A; Thomsen S; Silva E; Richards-Kortum R
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Jan; 52(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 8307499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Spectroscopic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in vivo using laser-induced fluorescence spectra at multiple excitation wavelengths.
Ramanujam N; Mitchell MF; Mahadevan A; Thomsen S; Malpica A; Wright T; Atkinson N; Richards-Kortum R
Lasers Surg Med; 1996; 19(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 8836997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A fusion-based approach for uterine cervical cancer histology image classification.
De S; Stanley RJ; Lu C; Long R; Antani S; Thoma G; Zuna R
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2013; 37(7-8):475-87. PubMed ID: 24075360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Observer agreement on interpreting colposcopic images of CIN.
Hopman EH; Voorhorst FJ; Kenemans P; Meyer CJ; Helmerhorst TJ
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 58(2):206-9. PubMed ID: 7622107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Grading cervical dysplasia with AgNORs using a semiautomated image analysis system.
Bharucha H; McCluggage G; Lee J; Bannister W; Kuan L; Wilhelm P; Nelson A
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1993 Oct; 15(5):323-8. PubMed ID: 8259973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
