306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26205574)
1. Exposure of Surgeons to Magnetic Fields during Laparoscopic and Robotic Gynecologic Surgeries.
Park JS; Chung JW; Choi SB; Kim DW; Kim YT; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Cho HY
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(7):1247-51. PubMed ID: 26205574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields during laparoscopic and robotic surgeries.
Chung JW; Park JS; Choi SB; Kim DW
Int J Med Robot; 2016 Sep; 12(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 26183334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exposure of surgeons to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields during laparoscopic and robotic surgeries.
Park JS; Chung JW; Kim NK; Cho MS; Kang CM; Choi SB; Kim DW
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Feb; 94(6):e539. PubMed ID: 25674758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy and Safety of Robotic Procedures Performed Using the da Vinci Robotic Surgical System at a Single Institute in Korea: Experience with 10000 Cases.
Koh DH; Jang WS; Park JW; Ham WS; Han WK; Rha KH; Choi YD
Yonsei Med J; 2018 Oct; 59(8):975-981. PubMed ID: 30187705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How to set up a robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery center and training of staff.
Lenihan JP
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Nov; 45():19-31. PubMed ID: 28566135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.
Choussein S; Srouji SS; Farland LV; Wietsma A; Missmer SA; Hollis M; Yu RN; Pozner CN; Gargiulo AR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28734971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective comparison of postoperative pain and quality of life in robotic assisted vs conventional laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.
Zechmeister JR; Pua TL; Boyd LR; Blank SV; Curtin JP; Pothuri B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):194.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25108142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of postural ergonomics between laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy: a pilot study.
Tarr ME; Brancato SJ; Cunkelman JA; Polcari A; Nutter B; Kenton K
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 25315401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery.
Nezhat C; Saberi NS; Shahmohamady B; Nezhat F
JSLS; 2006; 10(3):317-20. PubMed ID: 17212887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic Surgery in Gynecology.
Moon AS; Garofalo J; Koirala P; Vu MT; Chuang L
Surg Clin North Am; 2020 Apr; 100(2):445-460. PubMed ID: 32169189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Memory Foam Pad Versus the Bean Bag with Shoulder Braces in Preventing Patient Displacement during Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery.
Farag S; Rosen L; Ascher-Walsh C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):153-157. PubMed ID: 28919502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: which should we use?
Fanfani F; Restaino S; Ercoli A; Chiantera V; Fagotti A; Gallotta V; Monterossi G; Cappuccio S; Scambia G
Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Aug; 68(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 26633042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.
Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Gynecologic robotic surgery and our initial experience].
Pilka R; Dzvincuk P
Ceska Gynekol; 2010 Dec; 75(6):512-7. PubMed ID: 27534006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery and Perioperative Morbidity in Elderly Women.
Krause AK; Muntz HG; McGonigle KF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):949-53. PubMed ID: 27287246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of Levels of Extremely Low Frequency Magnetic Fields Emitted From Portable Hand-Held Fans.
Choi S; Kim S; Bae S; Kim W; Park JH; Chung E; Park J; Park DU
Bioelectromagnetics; 2019 Dec; 40(8):569-577. PubMed ID: 31373404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
